[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85
[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20
Comments
Maybe you should think over the bold words in your quote.
So, if no ONE person can beat me, that somehow means I should take on two people? Three people? Four people? Fifty people? Where does it stop exactly? And if anyone can fight 2v2, how come the anit-Manifest side stopped showing up? Or are you suggesting those guilds are so full of trash, they are below "anyone" and Manifest is pure greatness and should've dispatched them with ease. That's an interesting argument to make considering your previous posts....
If you're a l33t player and you're fighting a regular player, why would you call in someone to help you if they do the same? You're supposed to be l33t. Calling in a friend makes you no different from the regular player you're fighting.
The game has gear, ping, class, and skill to separate players. I've seen Reapers take on two players at once because they rely on their class, and I've seen Brawlers take on two people at once because of their gear. If you think you're better skilled than any other player, why shouldn't you at least attempt to do the same?
The point you missed is, it doesn't matter if the l22t player calls in a friend or not. The other guy, the one who called a friend first, is the one who destroyed the integrity of the fight, he's the one who acted dishonestly.. What the l33t player does after that is his choice. If you want a fair fight, don't break the rules first. And if you break the rules, you have no right to try and claim a moral high ground. Manifest evened the odds, it was the other guys who "ruined CU"(because, well, it was actually BHS who ruined it).
They talk the talk, but they can't walk the walk.
Shouldn't need to =/= isn't allowed to. If they weren't better, there wouldn't be an anti-Manifest alliance. The mere fact other guilds felt they needed to outnumber Manifest 5(or more) to 1 is proof enough that they are better. Them choosing not to fight in such unfair conditions in no way means they are bad. All it means is...they wanted to really roflstomp the dishonourable enemy. If you can't play fair, don't expect others to humour you.
it is on you if you decide to wreck the integrity of the fight. I'd really advise you @Schwerpunkt to think about what you're saying here.