[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85

[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20

a 1v1 pvp tier list

edited January 2017 in PvP Discussion
V1.0

Here it is.

Felt the need to make dstance/astance Warrior and intimidation/nontank Berserker two different places on the list.

Placements were pretty much based on how many + signs I gave a class, personal experience, and capabilities of each class

S Tier - Classes that have no direct counters and little exploitable weaknesses. A strong class with a good amount of options in most scenarios.
A Tier - Classes that have a few unfavorable matchups. A balanced class that excels in one field but may lack options in another.
B Tier - Classes that have losing matchups with most of the roster. A class that can still do one or two things effectively and well, but may struggle greatly everywhere else.

Please DON'T:
  • comment about how ded PvP is. I know, I get it, I just put this together for fun.
  • comment about how X class should be higher because it requires more skill, or how Y class should be lower because it's braindead. The tier list is based on the capabilities of the class, not how much skill is required to play it correctly.
  • throw around insults while discussing placements
  • throw around insults in general

I guess I can't really stop you from doing all that, but please try to keep it civil in here.

Please DO:
  • share your thoughts on my placements and why you agree or disagree
  • share your own thoughts on where you think each class should be placed

I'm totally open to everyone's opinions (as long as you don't attach name calling to your arguments) and I'd be willing to make better versions of it after lots of discussion.

On that note, please discuss!
«1345

Comments

  • Pretty good list I only disagree with a couple.
    Lancer is actually pretty slow and hits rather soft, in 1v1 you rarely see any good lancers because yiu have to be really skilled in it to be relevant, IMO.
  • @TheNobleNoble, very true. I had a bit of difficulty deciding whether I should rank DStance Warr as #1 or Lancer.

    I decided to rank Lancer as #1 because of their high defense, extended combos with their Leashes, and the insane amount of lockdown in their kit with their various attack speed slows and Lockdown Blow. Although DStance Warriors have their deadly Backstab stun combos that they can extend more with KD chains, I feel like they lack the amount of control Lancer has with their oppressive staggers and AS slows. Throw in the "BM" skills (Second Wind, Adrenaline Rush, Iron Will off cooldown) and it becomes clearer that Lancers just have more survivability and control than DStance Warriors do.

    If I were to make a tier list excluding the BM skills from each class I still think Lancer deserves the top spot, but the matchup would be much closer. I believe in a 1v1 of equal gear and equally high skill, the matchup would be about 5.5-4.5 in favor of Lancers.
  • I agree, I am a pretty high ranked archer and I still get my [filtered] beat by some lancers, theyre stuns and lock downs are just too good. Also, i think archer should be put a little higher. why? just coz of this thing called ranged staggers. Staggers by themselves are pretty annoying to deal with but Back-to-back-to-back staggers from a distance can get quite annoying and is the reason why good archers dominate in 1v1's. Though we lack melee capabilities, i still play at very close range (like im a frinking slayer LOL) and rarely get punished.
  • Archer staggers are indeed really powerful, but they aren't nearly as powerful ever since Final Salvo was reworked into Sequential Fire. Before, Final Salvo was powerful due to the fact not only because it was an instant 18m stagger, but because it had that 50% chance to reset when glyphed, meaning you could buy yourself a lot of time for your skills to come back up off cooldown. Now that it's been reworked into Sequential Fire, I think Archers just can't buy themselves enough time for their skills to come back up compared to Gunners and Sorcerers. Maybe with correct use of slow traps, Web Arrow and Restraining Arrow, an Archer can kite effectively enough to win a fight, but most classes have enough mobility options to close the distance anyway.

    I know that Archers can cancel their Breakaway Bolt and Backstep animations with Sequential Fire to get behind blocks a lot easier, but assuming both parties know about every trick up each others' sleeves, that kind of approach is super obvious.

    I think Charge would be a better skill for kiting if it came up faster, but since the cooldown is so long compared to other melee classes' similar skills (Warr Charging Slash, Slayer Headlong Rush, Zerker Overwhelm) I feel like getting combo'd as an Archer is just inevitable.
  • Getting combo'd is quite avoidable at high level play. Trap baiting, tenacity at the right time, Iframing stuns (even BS).

    There's so much depth with archer, for instance, the idea of charging. It can intimidate your target and make them waste their iframes to attempt to dodge the shot. After they waste their iframes you can cancel the charge with Seq and then stun trap into a combo. gg.

    But in terms of two equally skilled players, archer is pretty low compared to most classes, the only they have going for them is stupidly long range and ranged staggers. But if its pro level playing even when people have a counter for what ever they could expect there's another counter after that. i.e. seq cancel BB. You can use BB into a lancer and the lancer will predict you will try to sequential cancel. You can do that THEN backstep and use RF on the back of the unsuspecting Lancer. or just be like [filtered] that and attempt to fake him out with the first kick of CQ then use the second kick when he drops his guard. gg

    and i miss that glyph too LOL, its coming back too along with extra damage.
  • xoBarbxoBarb ✭✭✭
    edited January 2017
    I agree, I am a pretty high ranked archer and I still get my [filtered] beat by some lancers, theyre stuns and lock downs are just too good. Also, i think archer should be put a little higher. why? just coz of this thing called ranged staggers. Staggers by themselves are pretty annoying to deal with but Back-to-back-to-back staggers from a distance can get quite annoying and is the reason why good archers dominate in 1v1's. Though we lack melee capabilities, i still play at very close range (like im a frinking slayer LOL) and rarely get punished.

    I am a pretty high ranked archer

    aren't you MRcuddlyface on FF??
  • xoBarb wrote: »
    I agree, I am a pretty high ranked archer and I still get my [filtered] beat by some lancers, theyre stuns and lock downs are just too good. Also, i think archer should be put a little higher. why? just coz of this thing called ranged staggers. Staggers by themselves are pretty annoying to deal with but Back-to-back-to-back staggers from a distance can get quite annoying and is the reason why good archers dominate in 1v1's. Though we lack melee capabilities, i still play at very close range (like im a frinking slayer LOL) and rarely get punished.

    I am a pretty high ranked archer

    aren't you MRcuddlyface on FF??

    YES
  • High ranked archer in what?
  • High ranked archer in what?

    his mind.
  • IlyphiaIlyphia
    edited January 2017
    Getting combo'd is quite avoidable at high level play. Trap baiting, tenacity at the right time, Iframing stuns (even BS).

    There's so much depth with archer, for instance, the idea of charging. It can intimidate your target and make them waste their iframes to attempt to dodge the shot. After they waste their iframes you can cancel the charge with Seq and then stun trap into a combo. gg.

    But in terms of two equally skilled players, archer is pretty low compared to most classes, the only they have going for them is stupidly long range and ranged staggers. But if its pro level playing even when people have a counter for what ever they could expect there's another counter after that. i.e. seq cancel BB. You can use BB into a lancer and the lancer will predict you will try to sequential cancel. You can do that THEN backstep and use RF on the back of the unsuspecting Lancer. or just be like [filtered] that and attempt to fake him out with the first kick of CQ then use the second kick when he drops his guard. gg

    If you're successfully trap baiting, iframing stuns, and using Tenacity at all without getting punished for it, that's not high or equal level of play. Getting combo'd is inevitable because you will get caught with Tenacity and both of your iframes on cooldown due to their long cooldown timers and how much distance they actually cover.

    Baiting iframes by charging would still work with Salvo resets, but the threat radius of being kicked into RoA combo is much smaller now without it. If you don't plan on using RF > Backstep > SF > CQ, I'm pretty sure the actual range of 2 staggers into CQ with just walking is about 10 meters, give or take 1 or 2 meters. Every class has an answer for an Archer sitting 10 meters away charging a shot. To name a few, Slayers can Backstab, Lancers can Leash, Berserkers can throw Tackle. You can iframe these options, sure, but every class still has some sort of 15 meter gap closer to close the distance while you're charging your shot again. If you decide not to bait iframes and you just shoot, you'll get a KD and frontcrit damage, and you'll probably get rushed by 2.5 seconds of Retal super armor.

    Rapid Fire cancelling is not a thing. I'm sure you know this, but that means Backstep into RF is going to take much longer than Backstep into SF because you have to wait for the entire animation of Backstep to finish before you can shoot RF. Any smart Lancer would just Backstep away the moment they see you trying to get behind their block in that fashion.

    Archer just isn't good right now whether you play them up close or far away. They're not absolute trash, as a highly skilled Archer can still do work on anyone that's even a little bit worse than them, but one would have to put in much more work than another class to achieve the same impact.
  • slayer master class.......... the dream....
    I agree, I am a pretty high ranked archer.

    you sure are good at sucking yourself.

  • Slayer higher than astance warr and ninja in 1v1 ayy lmao you must be living in your own little delusional fantasy world. both of these classes absolutely destroy slayer on every level imaginable and when properly played are pretty much untouchable to most classes. Sure you can icb and 1 combo bad players which is generally as frowned upon as using shadow reaping on reaper in 1v1 anyway, but slayer just doesn't have the ability to initiate properly and actually hit their opponent. any attack you make can easily be seen from a mile away and avoided then punished with a 100-0 combo by pretty much every class. Icb or no slayer just lacks any reliable initiations.

    also in what world is sorc bad have you actually tried to duel a good one or are you on a server that doesn't have a single good sorc like FF or CH? warp barrier is one of the single most broken skills in 1v1 the game and is on a ridiculously low cd for how good it is so it can be spammed like no tomorrow. it's more broken than triple energetic kaia's is in group pvp almost.

    The only class that should ever be lower than slayer in 1v1 is archer but now after the rework i'm not even sure that's the case anymore.
  • Slayer is actually one of the better classes against ninja 1v1. You have the iframes and anti stagger skills to compete. Don't just think of how to initiate but how to counter their initiation.
  • I never said they were "good". But if you are getting "absolutely destroyed" by a ninja, you need to learn the match up my friend. Because that's gonna be one of your easiest.
  • IlyphiaIlyphia
    edited January 2017
    I think Slayer loses to Lancer, Warrior, and Reaper. I think they win against Archers, Sorcs, and Berserkers, and they go about even with everyone else. That's why I placed them in the spot they are on the list. Slayer does lose to AStance Warrior, but I believe AStance Warr has more troubles with more classes than Slayer does, which is why I placed them lower. Slayers aren't good, but they're not trash tier like everyone makes them out to be, either. They're in a pretty decent spot overall.

    Warp Barrier is a really good skill, I agree. I'd probably place Sorc just a little bit higher on the list because of it. The only problem with them is that most classes can just eat Lightning/Painful Traps, making playing keepaway with Sorc a lot harder. Since the cooldowns on them are so long, having your traps eaten with Tenacity, absorbed with super armor, or just blocked make life as a Sorc really painful. Also when forced to approach, Sorcs have it pretty rough with their only options really being Lightning Strike > Mindblast or Flame PIllar > Lightning Trap. On top of that, most classes can just completely ignore Time Gyre with the movement of their skills or Tenacity.

    I think revamped Archer actually has a worse chance against Slayer without Salvo resets. Charge is a good skill, but the cooldown is so long and every class already has a mobility skill like that anyway on a much, much shorter cooldown.
Sign In or Register to comment.