[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85

[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20

[Rant] One thing I like about NA Tera and why I sometimes hate the NA community

2

Comments

  • aeee98aeee98 ✭✭✭✭
    vkobe wrote: »
    i dont really wish to talk about all the case pending we have against enmasse, but you are alway the first to come here to defend enmasse even when they did mistakes

    when we joined enmasse tera we agree than pve stay pve and pvp stay pvp, it would be appreciated if enmasse say to us than they could change this rule anytime before we sign to join tera, at least we would know what could happen to us, instead this backstab from enmasse by surprise

    The big question I had was, since when there is an agreement? They didn't change a rule that didn't exist. Since when did PvE stay PvE (if that is the case why enable battlegrounds for PvE servers and dungeons for PvP servers)?

    Sure the wording of the servers should have been "Outlaw enabled" and "Outlaw disabled", because that made more sense in the marketing of the server. all but because the fact remains that Tera was supposed to be a game where you could enjoy both PvE and PvP regardless of the type in the first place. Its like asking why are many of the best "PvE" players in Mount Tyrannas, a so-called PvP server lol.

    When FF was announced to be basically "Valley of Highwatch Tears" I emphasized that players should not just look so narrow-mindedly and enjoy the new server due to how the new structure is in place. Once again there are just clueless people complaining about being dragged into OWPvP when people including pure PvE players noted how few and far between PK is in MT post 65 to begin with.

    It is that plain notion that many Asians regardless of nation deem NA to be extremely sensitive over things that change that go slightly not in favour of them, even when it technically won't change the current status they are in. And the situation in Tera is but one of the many scenarios that portray this properly. Thankfully, not all Americans are like that, there are still a small handful of people knowing how to see the big picture of things, whereas many Americans lack foresight.
  • aeee98aeee98 ✭✭✭✭
    ElinUsagi wrote: »
    [filtered] I've even watched videos where gamers outright yell and kick their desk when something does not go right for them.

    League of Lengends?

    CS:GO, BF series, DOTA, Overwatch, etc etc etc etc. It is everywhere. Heck it goes even to reddit, facebook, twitter and whatnot. Even worse is now that Trump, the president that people elected for, is doing similar actions in public and social media, deeming this toxic behaviour as perfectly fine, when it obviously isn't.
  • vkobevkobe ✭✭✭✭✭
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    i dont really wish to talk about all the case pending we have against enmasse, but you are alway the first to come here to defend enmasse even when they did mistakes

    when we joined enmasse tera we agree than pve stay pve and pvp stay pvp, it would be appreciated if enmasse say to us than they could change this rule anytime before we sign to join tera, at least we would know what could happen to us, instead this backstab from enmasse by surprise

    The big question I had was, since when there is an agreement? They didn't change a rule that didn't exist. Since when did PvE stay PvE (if that is the case why enable battlegrounds for PvE servers and dungeons for PvP servers)?

    Sure the wording of the servers should have been "Outlaw enabled" and "Outlaw disabled", because that made more sense in the marketing of the server. all but because the fact remains that Tera was supposed to be a game where you could enjoy both PvE and PvP regardless of the type in the first place. Its like asking why are many of the best "PvE" players in Mount Tyrannas, a so-called PvP server lol.

    When FF was announced to be basically "Valley of Highwatch Tears" I emphasized that players should not just look so narrow-mindedly and enjoy the new server due to how the new structure is in place. Once again there are just clueless people complaining about being dragged into OWPvP when people including pure PvE players noted how few and far between PK is in MT post 65 to begin with.

    It is that plain notion that many Asians regardless of nation deem NA to be extremely sensitive over things that change that go slightly not in favour of them, even when it technically won't change the current status they are in. And the situation in Tera is but one of the many scenarios that portray this properly. Thankfully, not all Americans are like that, there are still a small handful of people knowing how to see the big picture of things, whereas many Americans lack foresight.

    if i remember when mudkip made his reaper genocide we all agree than if we are unhappy with that we can go to pve server and people asked why come in pvp server if we dislike pvp ? it is the agreement than enmasse choose to broke

    technically fwc, corsair, gildiron are not in pve server :)
  • aeee98aeee98 ✭✭✭✭
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    i dont really wish to talk about all the case pending we have against enmasse, but you are alway the first to come here to defend enmasse even when they did mistakes

    when we joined enmasse tera we agree than pve stay pve and pvp stay pvp, it would be appreciated if enmasse say to us than they could change this rule anytime before we sign to join tera, at least we would know what could happen to us, instead this backstab from enmasse by surprise

    The big question I had was, since when there is an agreement? They didn't change a rule that didn't exist. Since when did PvE stay PvE (if that is the case why enable battlegrounds for PvE servers and dungeons for PvP servers)?

    Sure the wording of the servers should have been "Outlaw enabled" and "Outlaw disabled", because that made more sense in the marketing of the server. all but because the fact remains that Tera was supposed to be a game where you could enjoy both PvE and PvP regardless of the type in the first place. Its like asking why are many of the best "PvE" players in Mount Tyrannas, a so-called PvP server lol.

    When FF was announced to be basically "Valley of Highwatch Tears" I emphasized that players should not just look so narrow-mindedly and enjoy the new server due to how the new structure is in place. Once again there are just clueless people complaining about being dragged into OWPvP when people including pure PvE players noted how few and far between PK is in MT post 65 to begin with.

    It is that plain notion that many Asians regardless of nation deem NA to be extremely sensitive over things that change that go slightly not in favour of them, even when it technically won't change the current status they are in. And the situation in Tera is but one of the many scenarios that portray this properly. Thankfully, not all Americans are like that, there are still a small handful of people knowing how to see the big picture of things, whereas many Americans lack foresight.

    if i remember when mudkip made his reaper genocide we all agree than if we are unhappy with that we can go to pve server and people asked why come in pvp server if we dislike pvp ? it is the agreement than enmasse choose to broke

    technically fwc, corsair, gildiron are not in pve server :)

    not all. In fact by saying that you are completely clueless to how few people even know about Mudkip, let alone any agreement of sorts. This is something you yourself and a select few enforced.

    And also people from old HW would have known that there are is still that PvP community. Sure it looked very small and aren't at the strength/skill level of Manifest. but it still exist. CS, FWC and Grid were still queued periodically by pure PvE players not just for credits rofl. Now you know why I say people don't have foresight.
  • vkobevkobe ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2017
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    i dont really wish to talk about all the case pending we have against enmasse, but you are alway the first to come here to defend enmasse even when they did mistakes

    when we joined enmasse tera we agree than pve stay pve and pvp stay pvp, it would be appreciated if enmasse say to us than they could change this rule anytime before we sign to join tera, at least we would know what could happen to us, instead this backstab from enmasse by surprise

    The big question I had was, since when there is an agreement? They didn't change a rule that didn't exist. Since when did PvE stay PvE (if that is the case why enable battlegrounds for PvE servers and dungeons for PvP servers)?

    Sure the wording of the servers should have been "Outlaw enabled" and "Outlaw disabled", because that made more sense in the marketing of the server. all but because the fact remains that Tera was supposed to be a game where you could enjoy both PvE and PvP regardless of the type in the first place. Its like asking why are many of the best "PvE" players in Mount Tyrannas, a so-called PvP server lol.

    When FF was announced to be basically "Valley of Highwatch Tears" I emphasized that players should not just look so narrow-mindedly and enjoy the new server due to how the new structure is in place. Once again there are just clueless people complaining about being dragged into OWPvP when people including pure PvE players noted how few and far between PK is in MT post 65 to begin with.

    It is that plain notion that many Asians regardless of nation deem NA to be extremely sensitive over things that change that go slightly not in favour of them, even when it technically won't change the current status they are in. And the situation in Tera is but one of the many scenarios that portray this properly. Thankfully, not all Americans are like that, there are still a small handful of people knowing how to see the big picture of things, whereas many Americans lack foresight.

    if i remember when mudkip made his reaper genocide we all agree than if we are unhappy with that we can go to pve server and people asked why come in pvp server if we dislike pvp ? it is the agreement than enmasse choose to broke

    technically fwc, corsair, gildiron are not in pve server :)

    not all. In fact by saying that you are completely clueless to how few people even know about Mudkip, let alone any agreement of sorts. This is something you yourself and a select few enforced.

    And also people from old HW would have known that there are is still that PvP community. Sure it looked very small and aren't at the strength/skill level of Manifest. but it still exist. CS, FWC and Grid were still queued periodically by pure PvE players not just for credits rofl. Now you know why I say people don't have foresight.

    so why those people didnt go to mount tyranna instead they went to pve server? even while the free week transfert they could go there instead to go to hw, so your hw pvp seem to no like so much pvp :)

    well i just wish than enmasse said they could change the rule about pve and pvp anytime before we sign for tera, instead to take us by surprise with that :)

    so i agree with people who say than enmasse promise are only dirty rag :)
  • edited January 2017
    vkobe wrote: »
    well i just wish than enmasse said they could change the rule about pve and pvp anytime before we sign for tera, instead to take us by surprise with that :)
    Except they did. It's in sections 7 and 9 of the Terms of Service. They're not going to create a list of every single feature and condition in the game and disclaim, one by one, that each and every one of these is subject to change at any time. Anything and everything is subject to change, at any time, without notice, at their sole discretion. You agreed to that when you created your account.

    Again, we can debate all we want about how much notice they should have given, or whether it was a good idea to change, or whatever. But there was absolutely no promise, and absolutely no lie.
  • I could never understand why people think PK = PVP.
    Its just like saying slaughtering is a war... dishonor
  • vkobevkobe ✭✭✭✭✭
    vkobe wrote: »
    well i just wish than enmasse said they could change the rule about pve and pvp anytime before we sign for tera, instead to take us by surprise with that :)
    Except they did. It's in sections 7 and 9 of the Terms of Service. They're not going to create a list of every single feature and condition in the game and disclaim, one by one, that each and every one of these is subject to change at any time. Anything and everything is subject to change, at any time, without notice, at their sole discretion. You agreed to that when you created your account.

    Again, we can debate all we want about how much notice they should have given, or whether it was a good idea to change, or whatever. But there was absolutely no promise, and absolutely no lie.

    7 is more close the game and sincerely we all know this day will happen :3 and server merge

    9 i am not sure how it is change pve to pvp or pvp to pve
  • aeee98aeee98 ✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2017
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    i dont really wish to talk about all the case pending we have against enmasse, but you are alway the first to come here to defend enmasse even when they did mistakes

    when we joined enmasse tera we agree than pve stay pve and pvp stay pvp, it would be appreciated if enmasse say to us than they could change this rule anytime before we sign to join tera, at least we would know what could happen to us, instead this backstab from enmasse by surprise

    The big question I had was, since when there is an agreement? They didn't change a rule that didn't exist. Since when did PvE stay PvE (if that is the case why enable battlegrounds for PvE servers and dungeons for PvP servers)?

    Sure the wording of the servers should have been "Outlaw enabled" and "Outlaw disabled", because that made more sense in the marketing of the server. all but because the fact remains that Tera was supposed to be a game where you could enjoy both PvE and PvP regardless of the type in the first place. Its like asking why are many of the best "PvE" players in Mount Tyrannas, a so-called PvP server lol.

    When FF was announced to be basically "Valley of Highwatch Tears" I emphasized that players should not just look so narrow-mindedly and enjoy the new server due to how the new structure is in place. Once again there are just clueless people complaining about being dragged into OWPvP when people including pure PvE players noted how few and far between PK is in MT post 65 to begin with.

    It is that plain notion that many Asians regardless of nation deem NA to be extremely sensitive over things that change that go slightly not in favour of them, even when it technically won't change the current status they are in. And the situation in Tera is but one of the many scenarios that portray this properly. Thankfully, not all Americans are like that, there are still a small handful of people knowing how to see the big picture of things, whereas many Americans lack foresight.

    if i remember when mudkip made his reaper genocide we all agree than if we are unhappy with that we can go to pve server and people asked why come in pvp server if we dislike pvp ? it is the agreement than enmasse choose to broke

    technically fwc, corsair, gildiron are not in pve server :)

    not all. In fact by saying that you are completely clueless to how few people even know about Mudkip, let alone any agreement of sorts. This is something you yourself and a select few enforced.

    And also people from old HW would have known that there are is still that PvP community. Sure it looked very small and aren't at the strength/skill level of Manifest. but it still exist. CS, FWC and Grid were still queued periodically by pure PvE players not just for credits rofl. Now you know why I say people don't have foresight.

    so why those people didnt go to mount tyranna instead to go to pve server? even while the free week transfert they could go there instead to go to hw, so your hw pvp seem to no like so much pvp :)

    well i just wish than enmasse said they could change the rule about pve and pvp anytime before we sign for tera, instead to take us by surprise with that :)

    so i agree with people who say than enmasse promise are only dirty rag :)

    It is not like EME actually wanted this merge. The damage of VoT and LoT being too small is one thing, MT being too big is another. LoT + VoT isn't even close to HW or current AV size. So they had to make the compromise. If they could choose not to turn the eventual server into one that a part of the community dislikes, they wouldn't, but they are making the best possible solution while damaging the community as little as possible.
    Minazuki wrote: »
    I could never understand why people think PK = PVP.
    Its just like saying slaughtering is a war... dishonor

    It isn't, that's kinda why I find the branding to be pretty funny.
  • vkobevkobe ✭✭✭✭✭
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    i dont really wish to talk about all the case pending we have against enmasse, but you are alway the first to come here to defend enmasse even when they did mistakes

    when we joined enmasse tera we agree than pve stay pve and pvp stay pvp, it would be appreciated if enmasse say to us than they could change this rule anytime before we sign to join tera, at least we would know what could happen to us, instead this backstab from enmasse by surprise

    The big question I had was, since when there is an agreement? They didn't change a rule that didn't exist. Since when did PvE stay PvE (if that is the case why enable battlegrounds for PvE servers and dungeons for PvP servers)?

    Sure the wording of the servers should have been "Outlaw enabled" and "Outlaw disabled", because that made more sense in the marketing of the server. all but because the fact remains that Tera was supposed to be a game where you could enjoy both PvE and PvP regardless of the type in the first place. Its like asking why are many of the best "PvE" players in Mount Tyrannas, a so-called PvP server lol.

    When FF was announced to be basically "Valley of Highwatch Tears" I emphasized that players should not just look so narrow-mindedly and enjoy the new server due to how the new structure is in place. Once again there are just clueless people complaining about being dragged into OWPvP when people including pure PvE players noted how few and far between PK is in MT post 65 to begin with.

    It is that plain notion that many Asians regardless of nation deem NA to be extremely sensitive over things that change that go slightly not in favour of them, even when it technically won't change the current status they are in. And the situation in Tera is but one of the many scenarios that portray this properly. Thankfully, not all Americans are like that, there are still a small handful of people knowing how to see the big picture of things, whereas many Americans lack foresight.

    if i remember when mudkip made his reaper genocide we all agree than if we are unhappy with that we can go to pve server and people asked why come in pvp server if we dislike pvp ? it is the agreement than enmasse choose to broke

    technically fwc, corsair, gildiron are not in pve server :)

    not all. In fact by saying that you are completely clueless to how few people even know about Mudkip, let alone any agreement of sorts. This is something you yourself and a select few enforced.

    And also people from old HW would have known that there are is still that PvP community. Sure it looked very small and aren't at the strength/skill level of Manifest. but it still exist. CS, FWC and Grid were still queued periodically by pure PvE players not just for credits rofl. Now you know why I say people don't have foresight.

    so why those people didnt go to mount tyranna instead to go to pve server? even while the free week transfert they could go there instead to go to hw, so your hw pvp seem to no like so much pvp :)

    well i just wish than enmasse said they could change the rule about pve and pvp anytime before we sign for tera, instead to take us by surprise with that :)

    so i agree with people who say than enmasse promise are only dirty rag :)

    It is not like EME actually wanted this merge. The damage of VoT and LoT being too small is one thing, MT being too big is another. LoT + VoT isn't even close to HW or current AV size. So they had to make the compromise. If they could choose not to turn the eventual server into one that a part of the community dislikes, they wouldn't, but they are making the best possible solution while damaging the community as little as possible.
    Minazuki wrote: »
    I could never understand why people think PK = PVP.
    Its just like saying slaughtering is a war... dishonor

    It isn't, that's kinda why I find the branding to be pretty funny.

    they dont want the merge and gameforge dont want it too, but explain me how gameforge were able to do well their merge and us we turn our merge in big drama ?

    if i remember server in gameforge are smaller than ours, but they were able to merge the 2 french server and the 2 germans server and those servers were smaller than vot or lot or hw
  • YamazukiYamazuki ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2017
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    i dont really wish to talk about all the case pending we have against enmasse, but you are alway the first to come here to defend enmasse even when they did mistakes

    when we joined enmasse tera we agree than pve stay pve and pvp stay pvp, it would be appreciated if enmasse say to us than they could change this rule anytime before we sign to join tera, at least we would know what could happen to us, instead this backstab from enmasse by surprise

    The big question I had was, since when there is an agreement? They didn't change a rule that didn't exist. Since when did PvE stay PvE (if that is the case why enable battlegrounds for PvE servers and dungeons for PvP servers)?

    Sure the wording of the servers should have been "Outlaw enabled" and "Outlaw disabled", because that made more sense in the marketing of the server. all but because the fact remains that Tera was supposed to be a game where you could enjoy both PvE and PvP regardless of the type in the first place. Its like asking why are many of the best "PvE" players in Mount Tyrannas, a so-called PvP server lol.

    When FF was announced to be basically "Valley of Highwatch Tears" I emphasized that players should not just look so narrow-mindedly and enjoy the new server due to how the new structure is in place. Once again there are just clueless people complaining about being dragged into OWPvP when people including pure PvE players noted how few and far between PK is in MT post 65 to begin with.

    It is that plain notion that many Asians regardless of nation deem NA to be extremely sensitive over things that change that go slightly not in favour of them, even when it technically won't change the current status they are in. And the situation in Tera is but one of the many scenarios that portray this properly. Thankfully, not all Americans are like that, there are still a small handful of people knowing how to see the big picture of things, whereas many Americans lack foresight.

    if i remember when mudkip made his reaper genocide we all agree than if we are unhappy with that we can go to pve server and people asked why come in pvp server if we dislike pvp ? it is the agreement than enmasse choose to broke

    technically fwc, corsair, gildiron are not in pve server :)

    not all. In fact by saying that you are completely clueless to how few people even know about Mudkip, let alone any agreement of sorts. This is something you yourself and a select few enforced.

    And also people from old HW would have known that there are is still that PvP community. Sure it looked very small and aren't at the strength/skill level of Manifest. but it still exist. CS, FWC and Grid were still queued periodically by pure PvE players not just for credits rofl. Now you know why I say people don't have foresight.

    so why those people didnt go to mount tyranna instead to go to pve server? even while the free week transfert they could go there instead to go to hw, so your hw pvp seem to no like so much pvp :)

    well i just wish than enmasse said they could change the rule about pve and pvp anytime before we sign for tera, instead to take us by surprise with that :)

    so i agree with people who say than enmasse promise are only dirty rag :)

    It is not like EME actually wanted this merge. The damage of VoT and LoT being too small is one thing, MT being too big is another. LoT + VoT isn't even close to HW or current AV size. So they had to make the compromise. If they could choose not to turn the eventual server into one that a part of the community dislikes, they wouldn't, but they are making the best possible solution while damaging the community as little as possible.
    Minazuki wrote: »
    I could never understand why people think PK = PVP.
    Its just like saying slaughtering is a war... dishonor

    It isn't, that's kinda why I find the branding to be pretty funny.

    they dont want the merge and gameforge dont want it too, but explain me how gameforge were able to do well their merge and us we turn our merge in big drama ?

    if i remember server in gameforge are smaller than ours, but they were able to merge the 2 french server and the 2 germans server and those servers were smaller than vot or lot or hw

    There were complaints about the pvp @ 65 on the GF forums... It wasn't even mentioned in their patch notes either. There's also the fact their forum isn't even as active either, first page of English General has last posts from a week ago. On the GF forums they also lock/delete any topic that states EME has done something better than them, where as EME censors nothing other than posts that are out of line. They have less "drama" because there's less posting done there, and they are being censored for more than just violating rules.
  • ElinUsagiElinUsagi ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yamazuki wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    aeee98 wrote: »
    vkobe wrote: »
    i dont really wish to talk about all the case pending we have against enmasse, but you are alway the first to come here to defend enmasse even when they did mistakes

    when we joined enmasse tera we agree than pve stay pve and pvp stay pvp, it would be appreciated if enmasse say to us than they could change this rule anytime before we sign to join tera, at least we would know what could happen to us, instead this backstab from enmasse by surprise

    The big question I had was, since when there is an agreement? They didn't change a rule that didn't exist. Since when did PvE stay PvE (if that is the case why enable battlegrounds for PvE servers and dungeons for PvP servers)?

    Sure the wording of the servers should have been "Outlaw enabled" and "Outlaw disabled", because that made more sense in the marketing of the server. all but because the fact remains that Tera was supposed to be a game where you could enjoy both PvE and PvP regardless of the type in the first place. Its like asking why are many of the best "PvE" players in Mount Tyrannas, a so-called PvP server lol.

    When FF was announced to be basically "Valley of Highwatch Tears" I emphasized that players should not just look so narrow-mindedly and enjoy the new server due to how the new structure is in place. Once again there are just clueless people complaining about being dragged into OWPvP when people including pure PvE players noted how few and far between PK is in MT post 65 to begin with.

    It is that plain notion that many Asians regardless of nation deem NA to be extremely sensitive over things that change that go slightly not in favour of them, even when it technically won't change the current status they are in. And the situation in Tera is but one of the many scenarios that portray this properly. Thankfully, not all Americans are like that, there are still a small handful of people knowing how to see the big picture of things, whereas many Americans lack foresight.

    if i remember when mudkip made his reaper genocide we all agree than if we are unhappy with that we can go to pve server and people asked why come in pvp server if we dislike pvp ? it is the agreement than enmasse choose to broke

    technically fwc, corsair, gildiron are not in pve server :)

    not all. In fact by saying that you are completely clueless to how few people even know about Mudkip, let alone any agreement of sorts. This is something you yourself and a select few enforced.

    And also people from old HW would have known that there are is still that PvP community. Sure it looked very small and aren't at the strength/skill level of Manifest. but it still exist. CS, FWC and Grid were still queued periodically by pure PvE players not just for credits rofl. Now you know why I say people don't have foresight.

    so why those people didnt go to mount tyranna instead to go to pve server? even while the free week transfert they could go there instead to go to hw, so your hw pvp seem to no like so much pvp :)

    well i just wish than enmasse said they could change the rule about pve and pvp anytime before we sign for tera, instead to take us by surprise with that :)

    so i agree with people who say than enmasse promise are only dirty rag :)

    It is not like EME actually wanted this merge. The damage of VoT and LoT being too small is one thing, MT being too big is another. LoT + VoT isn't even close to HW or current AV size. So they had to make the compromise. If they could choose not to turn the eventual server into one that a part of the community dislikes, they wouldn't, but they are making the best possible solution while damaging the community as little as possible.
    Minazuki wrote: »
    I could never understand why people think PK = PVP.
    Its just like saying slaughtering is a war... dishonor

    It isn't, that's kinda why I find the branding to be pretty funny.

    they dont want the merge and gameforge dont want it too, but explain me how gameforge were able to do well their merge and us we turn our merge in big drama ?

    if i remember server in gameforge are smaller than ours, but they were able to merge the 2 french server and the 2 germans server and those servers were smaller than vot or lot or hw

    There were complaints about the pvp @ 65 on the GF forums... It wasn't even mentioned in their patch notes either. There's also the fact their forum isn't even as active either, first page of English General has last posts from a week ago. On the GF forums they also lock/delete any topic that states EME has done something better than them, where as EME censors nothing other than posts that are out of line. They have less "drama" because there's less posting done there, and they are being censored for more than just violating rules.

    We have freedom of speak and many users here dare to compare GF, the one who has his feet on the users neck to clean the forums from complains.
  • games come and games go. if game companies looked at games that has stood the test of time and those that have failed withing a couple of years, and learned from both, then there would be some really great games out there. tera is a good game, but they should stop removing stuff in the game, and start adding other things into it. its theirs to do with as they please. I will just keep playing until they shut the doors.
  • There's also the fact their forum isn't even as active either, first page of English General has last posts from a week ago.

    Umm no, it doesn't. There can be many bad things to say about GF/TeraEU, but that's blatantly false.
  • edited January 2017
    msoltyspl wrote: »
    There's also the fact their forum isn't even as active either, first page of English General has last posts from a week ago.

    Umm no, it doesn't. There can be many bad things to say about GF/TeraEU, but that's blatantly false.

    It's true as stated, but he didn't say the last post is from a week ago. Just that the first page of the English General forum has last posts a week ago. The bottom thread on the first page listing (sorted by last post) has its last post on 22 January 2017, so over a week ago. In other words, their forum is a lot less busy than this one, which is the case. However, it doesn't necessarily mean much as far as a statistic goes.
Sign In or Register to comment.