[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85
[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20
Whens the slayer revamp?
My slayer is very weak in pve and I have all the right crystals to give it crit but nothing really works I can only get to 1m and if lucky 3m when's the rework coming?
0
Comments
if bhs still continue to just do crap, tera will gone before slayer revamp
I think Slayer will be next to get a revamp because it has the highest need, but BHS do not have a good history of making good decisions so maybe priest will be top DPS in 6 months time.
Gunner?
I said classic classes
Lancer was their intended next unless they change their mind. The order they are going in are from the classes where there's the most complaints and not the most needs. Otherwise the first 3 classes would've been Berserker, Slayer, and Gunner as they are either under performing even before the 1st revamp (Slayer and Gunner) or have multiple design flaws and low popularity (Berserker, Gunner, and Slayer)
Berserker got a revamp years ago so did Mystics. Or were those pretty major reworks not enough? Even priests to a lesser degree when estars got major buffs. Slayer needs a revamp and I think Lancer is and always has been a class that didn't need work done to it. What complains would you have with lancer?
not sure what I did to put a bee in your bonnet?
A revamp is supposed to be a major overhaul that preserves the intention of the class, it's feel and playstyle while improving playability and making large scale changes to ensure that the class works in the spirit of its intent. It isn't supposed to be pretty much the same thing with a buff, like warrior, but large scale changes like sorc and archer. There is a difference between minor class balancing changes, a few fixes and improvement to various skills and a revamp.
I do not think you could rightly describe the tanking stance for zerker as a revamp, especially since zerker tanks are not desired in harder dungeon and function more as a makeshift tank when needed for easier dungeons. The modifications did not change day to day zerking which remains pretty much the same.
Mystic has only had one overhaul, on the 2nd of July 2013, mystic got new thralls and few changes. They also received a collection of fixes recently to (along with other things) improve lock on heals. The class pretty much plays the same though and I would hardly call either of these two events a revamp.
I don't know anything about priests, don't play the class, couldn't be bothered learning. Even so I am unaware of us ever getting a revamped priest.
I never said slayer doesn't need a revamp.
Lancer is an awesome class... if you have a low ping. It is completely broken if you have a high ping. What I find funny is people just sort of accept this as something that must be so, it shouldn't be this way. The class should use proper client side prediction, but it doesn't due to poor codework. While I don't know if I think it needs an a revamp, it does need work done to improve client side prediction or it needs to be modified so incompetently coded client side prediction isn't an issue.
If only