[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85
[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20
Comments
Again this is like this in every big online game its just how it is. You have to know these things and expect them as a gm hes been a gm for what years now? and still does not know what the community is like? It is clearly him. There will always be a large amount of toxic people in any game espcially with pvp NEED I SAY ALWAYS AGAIN?
This common sense
Or, he could keep on doing his job to the best of his abilities, within the constraints he is under, and just tune out unreasonable feedback like this. It's just one part of a larger event that is completely optional (that has given away a ton of free stuff), and the amount of drama (saying he should step down from his job over this?!) is completely unreasonable. They could have not even done this event at all and just left it as regular Kyra's without Mongos; I suppose then no one would have been "disappointed" but also no one would have gotten any of the extra loot from it either.
There is good feedback here that needs to be taken forward and considered for the future. But this drama is just excessive and stupid. Mongos are supposed to be a bonus to this event, not something that causes this much stress, even if there were less-than-ideal aspects in the implementation. Those aspects can be raised as constructive feedback for the future, and that's good enough. Life will go on. Being fatalistic about everything doesn't get the powers that be to take it more seriously.
I agree all this was just a optional action to compliment the Kyra Event. Many of you are being self-entitled and being toxic just because you weren't online or able to join a raid. There is no blame anywhere for anyone, this is all just a series of events through the passage of time. It is what it is and nothing can change that.
In addition, many of you don't even check that Spacecats before every Friday, posts about the stream and what he plans to do or some kind of hint. There is no shortage of information or lack of communication. Please refrain from cancer posts and actually post real positive feedback instead of acting like children that demand everything to be spoon fed. Free things are a privilege not a right, and as such you make it less likely for events this good to come our way with being rude, inappropriate, and completely out of line telling Spacecats or other EME employee's to step down from their position.
I have been playing Tera for 5 years now, things are much better and slightly to moderately worse to this day.
Do I need to say this is the most inteligent post i have read so far in the forums?
Sad is toxic ppl are the ones who frecuent forums the most, so that will answer you why this is a common behaviour of ppl against the publishers and why some publishers as Gameforge just censor and ban ppl that just trows tantrums in the forums.
It is not unreasonable to expect a GM to know common things in a game and to call it that just b/c you dont like it is in fact unreasonable.
Mongos are just a bonus event - Excuse - to justify bad choices
This drama is just excessive and stupid - Excuse to try and end the conversation.
Life will go on- excuse
those aspects can be raised as constructive feedback and (Is Good Enough) nothing but an attempt to end the conversation again b/c of personal feelings.
Everything I am saying is based off of logic not personal feelings not hate b/c things didnt go my way but cold hard facts.
yeah b/c expecting people to show up withing 30 seconds of each boss spawn is reasonable >.>
That shows that you are not even trying to do mongos.
Not the problem of the GM that your greed want to have rewards for all the legendaries.
If they start when you're not in the same area/channel they can be killed before you character even finishes the teleporting animation and load in, and even if you're in the same area, but not channel, the countdown+load is long enough for it to die as well.
But they can continue looking for more legendary mongos and get the rewards from those.
However the greed of several individuals don't let them acept the fact that not always you will have everything the game has to offer.
The consequence of having a BAM with a large max number of hits is that more people are rewarded. But rewarding the most people possible was not necessarily the goal. You may think it should be the goal, but that is not a fact. The decision has consequences, and the consequences should be considered and explored. If EME makes it easier for more people to be rewarded consistently, it stands to reason that they will want to reduce the amount of rewards provided per person, because they are considering the total amount of catalysts made available in the world. It may be that they wanted only the first ~10 or so people arriving at the BAM to be rewarded and to make it a sort of race (and the rewards provided overall may have been based on the assumption that the amount of people rewarded will be limited). You might think that's a bad idea (because it basically adds a layer of RNG to the event, on top of the RNG of being online at the right time), but again, that's an opinion, not a fact. The premise of your thread takes the decision of what BAMs to spawn in isolation of the grander design of the event, as if just swapping out the BAMs would have no consequence except making everyone happy and being a "good choice." But it just shows that you haven't really considered the situation from all angles; GMs have to consider such things.
If you wanted to stick to "logic" and "cold hard facts," you should have just stuck to the actual issues at hand and made the case why the decisions inconvenienced you. This whole grandstanding tactic, along with the personal attacks, mean you never had the high ground to begin with. I don't want to "end the conversation" about the actual topic to be debated (the merits of various approaches to BAM spawning and reward distribution), but in order to do that, the whole thing needs to be reframed.