[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85

[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20

Remove or fix CU

13

Comments

  • xoBarbxoBarb ✭✭✭
    Imagine if CU towers/bams had the same system as the Rally Bams?
  • Elin123Elin123
    edited March 2017
    @EllieChu You've reinforced my point that CU is exploited with feeding and they are stupid enough to end CU early and have done so in the past.
  • xoBarbxoBarb ✭✭✭
    edited March 2017
    Elin123 wrote: »
    Koikoi wrote: »
    to the people complaining of Zerg guilds. everyone realizes the max account limit is 100 per? if 100 people is too hard to beat for a smaller 25-50 account guild. team up or merge guilds.

    Stop complaining and do something.

    No one is complaining about zerg guilds... The problem is guilds forming an alliance and feeding all of their towers to one guild. Sometimes even ending CU early before bams spawn and before anyone can do anything to stop them.

    towers kills give credit to the last person to hit them whats stopping you from getting the last hit on one of their feeding towers
  • There is nothing "exploitative" about allying with other guilds etc. If the system allows it, there's nothing people can do about it...
    - You could join the winning side? "Oh, they won't let me in!" Well that's not the game, that's just people.
    - You could make an alliance of your own to win by sheer numbers? "Oh but that's so much work and organization!"~ As before, it's not the game, but the people.
    - You could gear up for CU:V for a chance? "But I'm lazy!" Well too bad, don't whine then!

    People are greedy and bricks, nothing's gonna change that. If you want a chance for winning, you gotta work for it.
  • ElinUsagiElinUsagi ✭✭✭✭✭
    Jiutti wrote: »
    People are greedy and bricks, nothing's gonna change that. If you want a chance for winning, you gotta work for it.

    Work and coordination with other ppl, forming new alliances to destroy the current guilds that have CU monopolized.

    But ppl is lazy, they want CU rewards without being in CU at all.

    Ppl are greddy, lazy, QQ and mad at things when is not going their way.
  • Elin123Elin123
    edited March 2017
    @Jiutti @ElinUsagi
    Funny how you call other guilds lazy, greedy, and qq'ers when its your alliance that is unwilling to compete fairly, having to rely on feeding, and will end CU early when it doesn't go their way. There has been attempts to coordinate guilds against the alliance (which consists of the largest guilds on the server), it's near futile. You make it sound so easy, if we were to just work a little bit harder... it's not even close. Keep name calling and attempting to justify your poor sportsmanship. I'm done with this thread, EME and BHS clearly don't give a [filtered]. Enjoy your "hard earned' spoils.
  • I don't see anyone winning against a vast number of reapers gunners and lancers that are geared out the [filtered]. Good luck with all those staggers and knockdowns lmao.
  • MirakaelMirakael ✭✭✭
    Yeah, they should remove this.
  • TewiiTewii ✭✭✭
    I dunno, as a Mani member I gotta say CU is pretty lit for me :^)

    You complain about zergs and alliances but y'all have the same tools at your disposal, you just choose not to use it and instead complain about the system.

    And it's a massive guild v guild v guild v guildfest with massive numbers - what kind of fighting is it if it isn't a zerg?
  • The "Pick yourself up by your bootstraps" mentality is a little strong in this thread. It is unfeasible for smaller guilds to band together and beat the top alliance in CU unless members in that top alliance decide to renegade. They don't have the numbers. They don't have the gear. They don't have the PVP experience. Denying this is endorsing BHS's crappy PVP design choices.

    I'm not saying that this the fault of the CU players. Players can play however the heck they want within what's allowed. But CU is obviously very unbalanced to the point that it's dead and is only used to get some extra cash. In any mass PvP, if you don't artificially balance out factions, people will lazily gravitate towards the current winners and just sit there.

    I don't think there's a point to removing CU. However, it'd be nice if the next time BHS decides to do mass PVP, they actually try to incentivize the losers to continue competing.
  • xoBarbxoBarb ✭✭✭
    S1eep wrote: »
    The "Pick yourself up by your bootstraps" mentality is a little strong in this thread. It is unfeasible for smaller guilds to band together and beat the top alliance in CU unless members in that top alliance decide to renegade. They don't have the numbers. They don't have the gear. They don't have the PVP experience. Denying this is endorsing BHS's crappy PVP design choices.

    I'm not saying that this the fault of the CU players. Players can play however the heck they want within what's allowed. But CU is obviously very unbalanced to the point that it's dead and is only used to get some extra cash. In any mass PvP, if you don't artificially balance out factions, people will lazily gravitate towards the current winners and just sit there.

    I don't think there's a point to removing CU. However, it'd be nice if the next time BHS decides to do mass PVP, they actually try to incentivize the losers to continue competing.

    The fact CU bams work on last hit = credit opposed to most overall dmg = credit like rally bams should be enough incentive for smaller guilds to try to snipe the bam.
  • ElinUsagiElinUsagi ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 2017
    The moment when one guild has the most skilled players at their disposal the contest will be always one sided.

    No matter what says this comunity, they lust for free things, they don't like to try harder, they don't like to forma alliances.

    If the 3 more powerful guilds came to negociate the winner each week then that gives more ppl with rewards from CU.

    You only are complaining becuase your guild only have 3-5 members online and don't want to form alliances with other and compromise as the big guilds have done it already.

    Is not the powerful guilds and ir not EMEs fault that ppl cant be more dedicated to the game and that ppl want something without compromising with others.

    I dont see anything in this post but a QQ without anything that makes sense.

    And before anyone want me to asociate with those guilds I am not, I am from a guild that have at most 5 members on-line at the same time and I acknowledge the fact that if we are not dedicated players and don't look for alliances or even quitting the guild and joining another then there is no way to do something on CU.

    Learn to acept that you wont have everything on a silver spoon like mongos and kyras did.
  • KoikoiKoikoi ✭✭✭
    ElinUsagi wrote: »
    The moment when one guild has the most skilled players at their disposal the contest will be always one sided.

    No matter what says this comunity, they lust for free things, they don't like to try harder, they don't like to forma alliances.

    If the 3 more powerful guilds came to negociate the winner each week then that gives more ppl with rewards from CU.

    You only are complaining becuase your guild only have 3-5 members online and don't want to form alliances with other and compromise as the big guilds have done it already.

    Is not the powerful guilds and ir not EMEs fault that ppl cant be more dedicated to the game and that ppl want something without compromising with others.

    I dont see anything in this post but a QQ without anything that makes sense.

    And before anyone want me to asociate with those guilds I am not, I am from a guild that have at most 5 members on-line at the same time and I acknowledge the fact that if we are not dedicated players and don't look for alliances or even quitting the guild and joining another then there is no way to do something on CU.

    Learn to acept that you wont have everything on a silver spoon like mongos and kyras did.

    ^^^^^ exactly this.


    Smaller guilds whine, they cry, yet they refuse to put in effort to recruit or form alliances.

    EME Can't make you want to actually play the game - you guys need to do that yourself. CUV is there, make use of it and do what you have to do.
  • @ElinUsagi The fact is alliances against the top dogs have been tried and failed, and are not worth the effort. You are simplifying it way too much down to "you are lazy". In other pvp games such as Archeage, you can try all you want to form alliances to beat the top guild(s) they will still beat you until they get bored and lose a mass amount of players. The losing side will bleed numbers way faster as morale drops further leading to no one competing.

    It's not laziness it's a lot more complex than that. Alliances can be formed but they will break in seconds if people lose faith.
  • ElinUsagiElinUsagi ✭✭✭✭✭
    Baldurdash wrote: »
    @ElinUsagi The fact is alliances against the top dogs have been tried and failed, and are not worth the effort. You are simplifying it way too much down to "you are lazy". In other pvp games such as Archeage, you can try all you want to form alliances to beat the top guild(s) they will still beat you until they get bored and lose a mass amount of players. The losing side will bleed numbers way faster as morale drops further leading to no one competing.

    It's not laziness it's a lot more complex than that. Alliances can be formed but they will break in seconds if people lose faith.

    Faith is lost if you are not skilled enought, like in evey game and most on pvp games.

    Do you think that tops players and guilds got what they have in one day?

    You are only thinking silly becuase you want everything handed with no effort at all.

    If you are going to get demoralized for this then there is no game out there that is apealing for you in mass pvp.
Sign In or Register to comment.