[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85
[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20
Comments
You're one of the delusionals who don't realize TU had 4 raids vs their 1 at one point. The placement was to aid in their goals to not get zerged from 4 different sides.
@Blurberry You might want to switch those numbers or else it says you had 4 raids vs 1. And no i'm not a delusional I had it in my post to agrue that exact point and I removed it before posting, wasn't worth mentioning. I'm aware of the number disadvantage and putting yours in that area is smart that being said is negates actual pvp, good for winning bad for pvp. I'm gonna think about a couple ways to attack that area, the most basic which is what they're doing is just send numbers break through which isn't working obviously.
The point I make in that post is the pillars need you to split your forces offense/defense. It should just be raids vs raids or some other form which I gave examples of. Don't get so defensive, I speak neutrally.
raids vs raids with no objectives except kills..... Like GVGS?
We (TU) have been organizing with success dms/OW raid v raid with TS/Reign for quite sometime since Honor has taken a leave of absence for pvping in CU/BGS/VO/GVG
TLDR = Not participating in CU because they want to save face and try to bait MT xfers to join their guild because regardless of the fact they have the #s and the gear they still can't lead themselves out of a wet paper bag.
people putting ingame politics ahead of actually playing the game
If you have been doing DMs and OW that's a great way to train your alliance and get them involved. It will help all of you get better. No excuses for honor on the GvG thing. I'm still gathering info on CU but it seems like they're working on it. Taking a couple weeks off to get better is not something that means pvp is dead or they're not trying. Tbh I think they're losing practice on defending that they're going to have to work on as well as coordinating and integrating the new players joining.
If you look at it from the perspective of pvp with a broad mind you can see the pillars restrict what you can do. That being said it technically not a bad thing because it requires more of a strategy but it's become merely zerging/defending chokes. I'm sure if you enjoy owpvp you'd love to just be running with your raids and meet another couple raids and have quality fights.
CU isn't the place to cater to your want for a DM FFA. BGs and even the old Alliance territories have always been about structured pvp with clear objectives.
I'm sorry to hear you don't enjoy structured pvp/objectives and think you speak on-behalf of every pvper
FWC and CS can be won vs a team that is completely dominant at PVP which makes the BGs fun to play even if you're on the side that is getting slaughtered because theres still a chance at a comeback. having teamdeathmatch content would just promote boring meta play of the absolute best mass classes.
It's a 2 way street the other team is so dominant the chances of winning are slim in both Fwc and cs that being said those other ways are added in to give those who aren't as skilled the option to win which is another way to deter them from getting better.
omg, all familiar faces and I can beat some of them.
They may come to our FF, then they will build a wall and let us pay for it.
U mean Keneau the warrior? Or I spelled the name wrong, he is a nice guy.