[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85
[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20
4power 2power / 4 power 4 critical / 4 power 0.04 critical power for valkyrie ?
4power 2power / 4 power 4 critical / 4 power 0.04 critical power for valkyrie ?
0
Comments
i personally run 4p+2p on both my valk's rings. if running with priest (most of my runs are with mystics so i cant tell you for sure) and u think u need more crit factor u can try using keen vyrsks in place of power vyrsks to compensate.
having said that my valk is an alt that I'm not very good at. There are probably others who can give you better answers.
Getting 2 Power at that much Power is .39% DPS gain (inside Rag) or .43% DPS gain (outside of Rag). This is before Brooch/GShout giving even more Power during burns.
About 75% of Valk DPS is 100% crit chance (50% SC, 15% Runeburst, ~8% Glaive Strike). Maelstrom and Bloodflower (PEvasion) also have high/guaranteed crit chances. I'm just going to assume that you do 75% of your DPS in Ragnarok (3 SC in Rag vs 1 SC outside of Rag)
0.04 Crit Power is probably very slightly better than 2 Power in most cases for Valks.
4 Power 2 Power thus is a viable choice, although some people swear by 4 Power 4 Crit Factor in HM dungeons.
When reached +50, every other rolls should be power.
This is what I was gonna say. And let me add a few things.
Power - Damage relationship is not a linear relationship. It is something like negative exponential relationship (not sure if it is correct mathmetical term). It looks like;
This is the reason why "Pounding" works better than "Forceful" when your power overs a certain point.
Like @Obs said, valkyrie goes for full pwoer build, so it has the highest power than any other class. So the increas of power becomes less effective than increase of % dmg (crit pwoer 0.04 and pounding). From a few experiment, Cirt power 0.04 x2 (0.08, 8%) is better than additional power 2 x2 (total 4) for valkyrie dps. And Valkyrie's main damage comes from SC, Runburst which have 100% crit rate if you do correctly.
So obviously Power 4 + crit power 0.04 is the best for Valkyrie, but only if when all other accessories, and gears are correctly rolled.
You meant a logarithmic function.
Regardless, I would like to ask at which power point would crit power 0.04 exceed Power 2 XD. From my own testing I think I haven't reached that point yet.
Nice heads up about it not being linear tho, I would have guessed it was linear... How did you reach that conclusion tho, testing it out? Pretty interesting, really!
I would take a pretty blind guess that crit factor is also kinda like this then.
Sounds like a rare case of Pounding crystals coming back to use then, as they're flat percentage increase instead of factor increases, great finding there. Well, power build with poundings it is for my PVE valk then.
DPS gain from Power change is:
(newtotalpower + 100)/(oldtotalpower + 100). Convert to %.
DPS gain from %damage change is:
(newtotal%dmg)/(oldtotal%dmg)
Crit Power DPS gain is harder to calculate since some skills have higher crit chance/power, but you can just do it by taking the %damage contribution of each skill.