[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85

[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20

Any news about the gear revamp patch for NA?

13»

Comments

  • counterpointcounterpoint mod
    McOnosRep wrote: »
    counterpoint wrote: »

    McOnosRep wrote: »
    So are all non-KTERA regions now going to be roughly similar for release schedules?

    This has more-or-less been the case ever since the big patch schedule change in early 2016. Typically Japan, Russia, EU, and NA are all within a week of each other.

    Thanks for the clarification - for some reason i always thought the schedule was KTERA - > JTERA -> Others ....

    Yeah, it used to be. The change in early 2016 (that resulted in our long delay at the time) shifted J-TERA to the same schedule as the other regions.
  • ObsObs ✭✭✭
    Naru2008 wrote: »
    Obs wrote: »
    Yakusan wrote: »
    I'd be pretty upset if EME decided to also skip FI pathc honestly, I kinda want more time to do vs and I'd never rly gotten to try FIHM so when I first found out they got it back in ktera I was super excited.

    EME has no say.

    The dungeon was honestly really horribly designed.

    Actually they do have a say. They decide what patches to push live and what they don't. They can turn down a patch, and they can even skip a patch if they'd like, like EU is doing. The Publisher does have a right to accept, deny, or skip a patch.

    Uhm... no, they don't. Look at our high quality patch notes, stating changes to things that never appeared. Patches are copy/pasted between NA/EU and EME practically has no say in the matter. What really happened this patch was BHS just told GF/EME that they were skipping Patch 60/FI patch.
  • ElinUsagiElinUsagi ✭✭✭✭✭
    Obs wrote: »
    Naru2008 wrote: »
    Obs wrote: »
    Yakusan wrote: »
    I'd be pretty upset if EME decided to also skip FI pathc honestly, I kinda want more time to do vs and I'd never rly gotten to try FIHM so when I first found out they got it back in ktera I was super excited.

    EME has no say.

    The dungeon was honestly really horribly designed.

    Actually they do have a say. They decide what patches to push live and what they don't. They can turn down a patch, and they can even skip a patch if they'd like, like EU is doing. The Publisher does have a right to accept, deny, or skip a patch.

    Uhm... no, they don't. Look at our high quality patch notes, stating changes to things that never appeared. Patches are copy/pasted between NA/EU and EME practically has no say in the matter. What really happened this patch was BHS just told GF/EME that they were skipping Patch 60/FI patch.

    And if you want it to be complemented, it sounds logic to skip patches when we received a server transfer fix that is suposed to work on patch 61, so maybe that fix is not garantued to work in patch 60 and that could be the main reason to skip it.
  • ObsObs ✭✭✭
    ElinUsagi wrote: »
    Obs wrote: »
    Naru2008 wrote: »
    Obs wrote: »
    Yakusan wrote: »
    I'd be pretty upset if EME decided to also skip FI pathc honestly, I kinda want more time to do vs and I'd never rly gotten to try FIHM so when I first found out they got it back in ktera I was super excited.

    EME has no say.

    The dungeon was honestly really horribly designed.

    Actually they do have a say. They decide what patches to push live and what they don't. They can turn down a patch, and they can even skip a patch if they'd like, like EU is doing. The Publisher does have a right to accept, deny, or skip a patch.

    Uhm... no, they don't. Look at our high quality patch notes, stating changes to things that never appeared. Patches are copy/pasted between NA/EU and EME practically has no say in the matter. What really happened this patch was BHS just told GF/EME that they were skipping Patch 60/FI patch.

    And if you want it to be complemented, it sounds logic to skip patches when we received a server transfer fix that is suposed to work on patch 61, so maybe that fix is not garantued to work in patch 60 and that could be the main reason to skip it.

    Don't we already have the server transfer fix though?

    I'm sure the main reason for skipping 60 is to close the gap between Ktera and NA/EU since the FI patch is pretty worthless in terms of content.
  • ElinUsagiElinUsagi ✭✭✭✭✭
    Obs wrote: »
    ElinUsagi wrote: »
    Obs wrote: »
    Naru2008 wrote: »
    Obs wrote: »
    Yakusan wrote: »
    I'd be pretty upset if EME decided to also skip FI pathc honestly, I kinda want more time to do vs and I'd never rly gotten to try FIHM so when I first found out they got it back in ktera I was super excited.

    EME has no say.

    The dungeon was honestly really horribly designed.

    Actually they do have a say. They decide what patches to push live and what they don't. They can turn down a patch, and they can even skip a patch if they'd like, like EU is doing. The Publisher does have a right to accept, deny, or skip a patch.

    Uhm... no, they don't. Look at our high quality patch notes, stating changes to things that never appeared. Patches are copy/pasted between NA/EU and EME practically has no say in the matter. What really happened this patch was BHS just told GF/EME that they were skipping Patch 60/FI patch.

    And if you want it to be complemented, it sounds logic to skip patches when we received a server transfer fix that is suposed to work on patch 61, so maybe that fix is not garantued to work in patch 60 and that could be the main reason to skip it.

    Don't we already have the server transfer fix though?

    I'm sure the main reason for skipping 60 is to close the gap between Ktera and NA/EU since the FI patch is pretty worthless in terms of content.
    ElinUsagi wrote: »
    And if you want it to be complemented, it sounds logic to skip patches when we received a server transfer fix that is suposed to work on patch 61, so maybe that fix is not garantued to work in patch 60 and that could be the main reason to skip it.
Sign In or Register to comment.