[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85

[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20

If someone wants your name and has a character with more playtime than you, they can just take it!

2»

Comments

  • ChristinChristin ✭✭✭✭
    Right after the merge, everyone was bragging that they were able to get pretty much any names they wanted, because a lot of names ended up in the clouds to be taken by anyone. I lost all of the names on my most heavily played characters, because people were out there creating characters with the same names as others, because it was leaked that there would be some type of name wipe of everyone that hadn't logged in for 30 days.

    EME is doing pretty much everything they can to upset players. I have no idea what is really going on, but whatever it is, my suggestion would be to just rename your character, because your fight is futile.

    Now that people know they can do name appeals, expect a flood of players trying to grab up names where ever they can.
  • YowzaYowza ✭✭
    edited October 2018
    At some point, the whole appealing names fiasco needs to stop. This is a monster of their own making. If players with the most played time got the name to begin with (the way they said it would happen), we wouldn't be in this mess. But no, I'm guessing they got a merging script from BHS and ran it and was like "GARSH, THIS DINDU WUT WE FOUGHT IT WULD DEW... O WELL LOLOLOL". Now we have tons of names that were reset and subsequently lost and players selling them like hotcakes. I've read that they "discourage" selling names, but honestly they need to just ban people that do so. They're another reason this has been such a disaster.
  • I have the same [filtered] problem with the same GM, and I even had evidence proving that the person did not own the name beforehand, since I had the name and went on two other servers to check who had them before the day of merge. It was a lvl 65 warrior and then a lvl 1 warrior on the two other servers. But the day after merge the name was owned by a lvl 65 priest. The GM said the same thing the had more play time and made the character a long time ago before you did.
    I'm still shock because I provided SS of the names being sold buy other players and the current person did not own the name.
    He still is saying the person got it because they have more play time. And I'm still providing screenshots of the day before merge of who owned the names.
    And I'm hoping to get another GM involved also to see if it can be solved. If you have the same problem can you DM. I want to see if how you trying to get it fixed also.

    I hope you have success, my friend. I'll send you a DM.
  • Hate to break it to you name appealers the sad news is October 1st was the last day to send a ticket to name appeal and this was a week ago. Anyone that sent a ticket before October 1st have the right to name appeal.
    Please note the following, we'll honor this investigation starting up until October 1st, 2018.

    https://forums.enmasse.com/tera/discussion/28871/server-merge-update-naming-clarification-update-sept-18-5-30-pm
  • Kachi wrote: »
    Hate to break it to you name appealers the sad news is October 1st was the last day to send a ticket to name appeal and this was a week ago. Anyone that sent a ticket before October 1st have the right to name appeal.
    Please note the following, we'll honor this investigation starting up until October 1st, 2018.

    https://forums.enmasse.com/tera/discussion/28871/server-merge-update-naming-clarification-update-sept-18-5-30-pm

    Well that's good to know. Whether or not they're actually honoring their statement is another issue. My name was taken back on Oct 2nd, but I'm sure this "mystery name sniper" probably put his ticket in before Oct 1st.
  • With the merge i lost almost all my names, but thanks to that i got better ones than i originally had, so it was win for me.
  • I actually msged singlebear on discord and he has confirmed to me that as long as the ticket submission date is before the cutoff date Oct 1st then we can continue to talk to them in support regarding the name appeal. So we should be fine with that.

    My problem rn is not only the name appeal, I can't even send in a ticket regarding a bunch of my outfits that are currently owned by random IGNs that I don't even own. I can't even send in another ticket unless I confirm that the name appeal ticket is resolved. They want me to close my ticket so I can appeal for a different thing -_- this is so stupid.. just trying to shut ppl up. I'm going to keep trying to get my name back first.
  • feminziifeminzii ✭✭✭
    edited October 2018
    it sounds to me like they originally gave you the name back because the other person who had it was inactive, but then that person came back, appealed it, ended up being more active than you and they gave it back to them. I doubt they would just give anybody anyone else's name without having ever had it, though.

    I did have a couple of my names get appealed but to be fair I sniped them. So whatevs.
  • SageWinduSageWindu High Seat of the Jedi Council ✭✭✭✭✭
    Let me see if I understand this correctly:

    > I have a level 65 slayer that I've been active on for 4 years, right?
    > someone else just started playing the game
    > they have a name I like, so I can just use a name changer to basically usurp they're character because I have more playtime?

    Yes, you're reading that right: I'm intentionally being the bad guy here. I think I can understand the situation better that way.
  • SageWindu wrote: »
    Let me see if I understand this correctly:

    > I have a level 65 slayer that I've been active on for 4 years, right?
    > someone else just started playing the game
    > they have a name I like, so I can just use a name changer to basically usurp they're character because I have more playtime?

    Yes, you're reading that right: I'm intentionally being the bad guy here. I think I can understand the situation better that way.

    Most likely, this is exactly why the opportunity for an appeal was put in to place. Not to argue over what name belongs to who, but to find cases of intentionally stealing. You would also have to have that character play time on a different server that also happened to be merging with the server the other person is on, making it a little less likely to happen.

    It sucks you lost your name OP, but this is a pretty common issue with MMO server merges.
  • SageWinduSageWindu High Seat of the Jedi Council ✭✭✭✭✭
    DYLW5HFXJH wrote: »
    Most likely, this is exactly why the opportunity for an appeal was put in to place. Not to argue over what name belongs to who, but to find cases of intentionally stealing. You would also have to have that character play time on a different server that also happened to be merging with the server the other person is on, making it a little less likely to happen.

    Wow. That's a pretty sh***y system if that's accurate.

    Yet another piece of credence that EME has no QC.
  • Elinu1Elinu1 Canada ✭✭✭✭
    It was kind of a low blow by eme announcing the 30 day inactive renaming AFTER they took the servers down to merge. I lost almost all my names on Velika because most hadn't been logged in for at least 30 days to a maximum of 5 months.

    On the bright side I did get to keep some killer names on Kaiator server so I transferred there.
  • DYLW5HFXJHDYLW5HFXJH ✭✭
    edited October 2018
    SageWindu wrote: »
    DYLW5HFXJH wrote: »
    Most likely, this is exactly why the opportunity for an appeal was put in to place. Not to argue over what name belongs to who, but to find cases of intentionally stealing. You would also have to have that character play time on a different server that also happened to be merging with the server the other person is on, making it a little less likely to happen.

    Wow. That's a pretty sh***y system if that's accurate.

    Yet another piece of credence that EME has no QC.

    Stop putting blame on a company for regular practice in server merge. What exactly would you suggest, within reason, that they would do with players who share name conflicts who A) Have not logged in for 30 days or longer or B ) Have less than another conflicting player invested in the game. I definitely knew about the 30 day inactive rule before the server merge, however I heard it from a discord channel discussion in my own guild, so I cannot speak to the way the announcement was held. Disabling name changes does help to quell trolls but the other side of that is the ability to put a name you deem very worthwhile on a character with a lot of play time, completely inconveniences players for a full month or longer, of which you can be certain there would be forum posts just like this on the flip side.

    If you think this is bad, you should see Bless Online. They had an unreasonable queue time for launch, opened up to 16 new servers to compensate, and less than 2 months later, consolidated all of the servers in to two again, essentially wiping all early access names and on launch names with over a dozen conflicts between players. Not saying this went butter smooth but damn it can get a lot worse.
  • SageWinduSageWindu High Seat of the Jedi Council ✭✭✭✭✭
    DYLW5HFXJH wrote: »
    SageWindu wrote: »
    DYLW5HFXJH wrote: »
    Most likely, this is exactly why the opportunity for an appeal was put in to place. Not to argue over what name belongs to who, but to find cases of intentionally stealing. You would also have to have that character play time on a different server that also happened to be merging with the server the other person is on, making it a little less likely to happen.

    Wow. That's a pretty sh***y system if that's accurate.

    Yet another piece of credence that EME has no QC.

    Stop putting blame on a company for regular practice in server merge. What exactly would you suggest, within reason, that they would do with players who share name conflicts who A) Have not logged in for 30 days or longer or B ) Have less than another conflicting player invested in the game. I definitely knew about the 30 day inactive rule before the server merge, however I heard it from a discord channel discussion in my own guild, so I cannot speak to the way the announcement was held.

    What would I suggest? I'd keep things simple: if you have a character name that conflicts with another, whoever's character has less play time has to change their name. Lighten the blow by giving everyone an not-for-resale/trade (yet bankable) name changer for each character that player owns after the merge is complete. None of this arbitrary "But, if you log in at this specific time during this specific moon phase..." bollocks. The decision sticks unless there's hard, tangible proof that otherwise is the case. But that's just me.

    And I'm "putting blame on a company" because this is yet another thing that EME has done the ended up breaking something if not itself.
Sign In or Register to comment.