[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85

[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20

This is clearly scamming.

2»

Comments

  • CatoriiCatorii ✭✭✭
    People used to do this all the time with the 30/90 day elite vouchers too. i.e. pricing 30 day elites at the same price as the 90 days went for in the hopes that someone would be stupid enough to buy without reading.

    It's the same thing. It's not a scam, you can clearly read the item yourself and they can't give you an item different than what's on the TB even if you negotiate. Shady tactic? Yes, but all you have to do is look at the item and realize it's not identical to the other similarly-priced items.
  • SpacecatsSpacecats ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've removed some images and player callouts in this thread. If you believe a player is trying to scam others, report them to Customer Support so they can be investigated by a GM.

    In this case, a player was listing Elite 1-Day Vouchers at the same price other people were listing Elite 30-Day Vouchers. I think it's a stretch to call this a scam. There are a lot of factors here that could help explain their behavior, but at the end of the day the item is still properly labeled as 1-Day, and there is no rule against pricing things at any amount you want.

    I'm closing this thread because I don't think there needs to be any more discussion over it. Again if you see behavior you think is shady, report to CS so they can determine a proper outcome.
This discussion has been closed.