[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85

[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20

IoD BAMs (again - sorry)

12467

Comments

  • NopiNopi ✭✭✭✭✭
    How's slayer performance when handling Tier 3 IoD bams? Was thinking to create one...

    Slayer can kill all kinds of IoD bams with ease. You do have to research your class and be good at it. Not pro, just good. But with a slayer you can have a lot of back time so I always recommend a back crit setup. While not flawless, I've been fighting T3 bams as a DN slayer for the past few days. Going full back crit and double enrage on weapon(with flat and behind too) gives DN a good dps boost. Slayer can easily either stun or completely clear an hydra's lightning spin, keep giants in place through milking evades and stuns, and nagas.... everyone can kill nagas..
  • ChrisehChriseh ✭✭✭
    I think forcing players to do these BAMs solo, puts them in a position to learn the BAM patterns instead of zerg killing them. Overall making them better players. I'm not saying this was the intended functionality, but it forces players to play their class better. Players are made to consider their iframes, movement skills and how best to go about DPsing when they're the primary aggro target.
  • feazesherofeazeshero ✭✭✭
    edited June 2016
    Surprisingly the IOD bams VG's are too easy on my lancer, where it takes me about 25-30 minutes to finish all 6 (naga, giant, hydra, fimberlisk, fangspawn and teralith) depending how busy and if I am using priest buffs. I recorded myself once to see how fast I can do the naga, giant and hydra; took me roughly 15-17 minutes due to the channels being busy sometimes). When I try IOD as a different class like my gunner, it took much longer though and can feel the struggle there as other people are facing. I'm guessing IOD is easy for brawler/lancer but not as easy for dps/heal classes.

    There are probably reasons why they made this a solo type of farming in the 1st place but many issues arise for most people. For partying up with people, I can't do this because then I'd have to kill more than 1 bam to get credit for one. I'd finish much faster on my own on lancer vs where more than 1 person is partied together. If they did fix the party issue, it would be really beneficial for everyone. At the cost of that, who knows, they might make the bams more buffed if they did that.
  • feazesherofeazeshero ✭✭✭
    the Bug that you completed a Quest, after u pressed "H" and earn rewards, its showing another one WHICH IS WRONG. If u reopen "H" again the quest changes and i sadly killed like 5 millions wrong bams until i recognized that (multiple times) ....

    I've had that moment too few days ago, realized I was killing the wrong bam lol. I killed maybe 8 or 9, then realizing I'm not getting credit for some reason.
  • feazesherofeazeshero ✭✭✭
    edited June 2016
    I think I like the way IOD is at the moment. I sure don't want things to be handed to me easily but rather get good and earn it the right way. There is a reason why as the higher level bams ppl fight, the tougher they are. The only thing I hate is when the high tier bams try to trample walk over.

    It doesn't hurt to have a brawler or lancer as a secondary character to farm IOD. Possibly most will go with brawler because it's easier where lancer would require a high set of skill to do real good. Anyway that is just a suggestion. Since I main lancer, I use it to farm IOD and is the fastest out of all my characters.
  • NopiNopi ✭✭✭✭✭
    feazeshero wrote: »
    I think I like the way IOD is at the moment. I sure don't want things to be handed to me easily but rather get good and earn it the right way. There is a reason why as the higher level bams ppl fight, the tougher they are. The only thing I hate is when the high tier bams try to trample walk over.

    It doesn't hurt to have a brawler or lancer as a secondary character to farm IOD. Possibly most will go with brawler because it's easier where lancer would require a high set of skill to do real good. Anyway that is just a suggestion. Since I main lancer, I use it to farm IOD and is the fastest out of all my characters.

    I find lancer IoD farming every bit as easy as brawler farming. But that's my opinion. My only difference is that with lancer I don't fall asleep. :3
  • BrofessorX wrote: »
    How's slayer performance when handling Tier 3 IoD bams? Was thinking to create one...

    i was with a slayer in full SF and it took us forever to kill bams.

    OMG. *cries*
  • TheGreyWolfTheGreyWolf ✭✭✭
    edited June 2016
    @Maatkara I agree fully. I find some BAMs to be easier on certain classes vs. others, depending on mechanics. But you can't deny that some classes are just faceroll on every kind of BAM, while other classes have to work hard even on the easier ones. Not that I'm opposed to working hard, mind you. I just wish that all classes had to put in an equal amount of effort overall, even if some classes are better at certain BAMs. Not asking to change mechanics or class rotations, just a more balanced game in terms of damage and defense. I mean obviously tanks are supposed to be able to absorb more damage than dps and healers, but they should not also do more dps. Just as healers are better able to mitigate damage, but they shouldn't be out-dpsing the dps either. Dps classes are meant to do big damage with the tradeoff being that they aren't tanky or able to heal themselves, meaning they have to stay mobile. It makes no sense to have squishy dps classes that can't even do decent damage.

    As for the gunner/range argument... my main is an archer, yes we can attack at range. But trust me when I say that landing a back crit on an IoD BAM from range is nearly impossible. Even ranged characters have to stay at melee range if we want to maximize back time. The problem with gunner is that they can land back crits even from the front, and they have metal armor, and a leash / self heal bot. If you think that archers can just stand 15m behind a BAM lazily landing back crits all day... LOL... think again. Although yes, I will agree that nagas are easier than hydras and giants, because they also work well for archer rotations. I think archer and warrior have more in common than you might think.

    @Chriseh also agree with you on forcing people to solo the BAMs to hone their skills. Whether or not that was the original intent, it works. I always see healers complaining about dps who don't know how to dodge and tanks who don't know how to block, and they blame everything on healer because they expect to be heal carried through everything. When you play solo, you are responsible for keeping yourself alive, which I do believe makes you a better player overall.
  • @TheGreyWolf The problem is that the IoD BAM quests play directly to certain classes' strengths and therefore those classes will find them easy. Lancers and Brawlers are designed to sit in front of BAMs and do their thing, Warrior would be there too if Warrior tanking wasn't in a bit of a mess right now.

    With regards to Gunners, my point is that, unlike all other classes, Gunners can score back hits (with 100% chance of crit) from any position if they're within 15m (AB range is 18m but you need a bit of range to get let the AB pass through the boss). Arcane Barrage hit location counts from the point of detonation and not character position (Gunners are also the only class that can score back hits on Banyakas in Ghilliglade). Sorcers used to be able to score back hits from the front too but BHS "fixed" that quite some time ago.

    Warriors are great at maintaining back time, I think the problem for warriors is skill complexity. If a mobile BAM goes on a rampage, even though a warrior is supremely capable of avoiding being hit, they can find themselves too far away from the BAM to be able to get in an Edge maintaining attack before their hard-worked for Edge dissipates. The only reason I gave up doing top-tier BAMs on my Warrior was loss of Edge when Giants or Hydraths when on multiple charges in quick succession, quicker than Charging Slash or Backstab would come off CD.
  • NopiNopi ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 2016
    Was doing hydras yesterday on my DN lancer, and did note that these guys do spam attacks way too fast. I mean, Lightning spin followed by.... Lightning spin, then three of those spinning belt rush forward tramples? Also, about that rush forward spin belt thing. On classes that block or at least on my lancer, it sometimes... heck, many times, you press block only to be hit from behind (while the boss is in front of you) by the full attack for more than full damage because everything is critting as well. So only backstep helped me there.

    I used to do these only on ninja and slayer, the classes where you can milk stuns and evades, so I never really noticed the real frequency these guys attacked with.
  • @Maatkara warrior tanking is still a thing? Sorry, that's probably a sore subject... I support the idea of warriors being tanks but like you said, that's a bit of a mess right now.

    Gunners are still broken, you know it, I know it, BHS doesn't seem to care.

    As an archer main, my skillset is not as complex as a warrior, I'll admit that. But believe me that I feel your pain when it comes to super mobile BAMs. I spend most of my time on archer trying to get behind a BAM just to have the SOB turn around before I even have half a chance to pull off a shot. You work hard for your Edge, I work hard to position myself behind a BAM and fully charge up say a Radiant Arrow, just to have the [filtered] [filtered] turn around before I release the arrow - turning it into a "front crit" (that is if it even crits at all). Worse still is when I pull off a successful back shot and it doesn't even crit..! :( But then you have other classes who can facetank spacebar these BAMs while watching TV and eating a burrito. It's not even remotely fair.

    But, I don't really want to whine. It's not fair but it is fun, and it is feasible. I hope the incoming buffs will help equalize the situation, but even if they don't, I'm not about to abandon my beloved archer.
  • NopiNopi ✭✭✭✭✭
    @Maatkara warrior tanking is still a thing? Sorry, that's probably a sore subject... I support the idea of warriors being tanks but like you said, that's a bit of a mess right now.

    Gunners are still broken, you know it, I know it, BHS doesn't seem to care.

    As an archer main, my skillset is not as complex as a warrior, I'll admit that. But believe me that I feel your pain when it comes to super mobile BAMs. I spend most of my time on archer trying to get behind a BAM just to have the SOB turn around before I even have half a chance to pull off a shot. You work hard for your Edge, I work hard to position myself behind a BAM and fully charge up say a Radiant Arrow, just to have the [filtered] [filtered] turn around before I release the arrow - turning it into a "front crit" (that is if it even crits at all). Worse still is when I pull off a successful back shot and it doesn't even crit..! :( But then you have other classes who can facetank spacebar these BAMs while watching TV and eating a burrito. It's not even remotely fair.

    But, I don't really want to whine. It's not fair but it is fun, and it is feasible. I hope the incoming buffs will help equalize the situation, but even if they don't, I'm not about to abandon my beloved archer.

    It's unfair indeed for a few classes. Say, I also work hard on my slayer to get back crits. On Sorc? bi** please I went front crit with that one lng ago. Gave up trying to go behind anything. Then comes ninja and she can just toss almost all her rotation behind a stunned bam. I mean, do stun, and you have time for a jagged, decoy, double cut and skyfall, and the bam will start turning around when you are in the middle of circle of steel, which most likely also counts as a back crit. You then evade forwards between it's legs, toss a few normal attacks to kill all your cooldowns and before you kow it your stun is off cd. Time to repeat.... And people say it's hard to keep focus up.....
  • BrofessorXBrofessorX ✭✭✭
    i think it's very annoying that IoD bam quest are not all in the same order.
    you can even kill a bam from another quest and it will NOT start that quest.
    i just need to be lucky to have the same order of IoD quest as a guildie.
    fix this plz en masse.if u can
  • NopiNopi ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 2016
    sestina wrote: »
    Nopi wrote: »
    On Sorc? bi** please I went front crit with that one lng ago. Gave up trying to go behind anything.
    Then you are simply a bad sorc, period. Start blaming your own incompetence for once instead of following the trend of these lazy casual playerbase who are lazy from playing button mashing easy classes.

    No idea what made you say that. Maybe it makes you feel bigger to tell me I'm bad. Doesn't affect me since I have said and re-said in so many posts back that I'm a bad player and I don't care about fixing myself. I know I'm an incompetent player in all aspects. I suck, totally. I know it, and yes, I won't tell you to stop rubbing it in my face. If you feel like it, go broadcast it and make this post a meme in a random image site if it makes you feel better.

    Anyway, rant off. No hard feelings. I have nothing against you for this because as I said it doesn't affect me. Being bottom of the ladder has the benefit of being un-hurtable. XD Carry on.
    oh, and I'm currently 'maining' a Slayer. :p
  • CezzareCezzare ✭✭✭
    Back on the original post point: I agree that BHS will need to come with a good alternative for support classes for future solo content, maybe they will still try to balance things out in IoD, but I guess the changes will come in the form of class revamping.

    The old classes have very different skill sets and fight mechanincs, you can't tackle IoD BAMs (or any boss type monster) the same way with each, with my slayer I can reposition and attack really fast, even chase BAMs when they trample away from me ("Remaining stationary so you can stab me to death? LOL no" , said the BAM), with my archer is easier to let them charge at me so I can iframe through and hit them from behind, same with sorcerer (not to mention the later 2 classes are very high-ping-unfriendly, some guides even tell you to outright delete your sorc or archer if you have a ping over 100 ms).

    So, I agree the developers need to keep in mind not all players use DPS classes the next time they design solo content, I don't hold any hopes for adding new tasks in IoD in the near future, though. At the same time, new players need to understand that:

    1.- New classes are overpowered when compared against any of the original classes, they will always have it easier soloing stuff.
    2.- Old classes' mechanics are different from each other, let alone from new class' mechanics, anyone complaining they can't facetank BAMs with their sorc like they do with their brawler kinda misread the class description.
    3.- If it's not your main you won't perform as good as others, specially if your alts are heavily undergeared (and if you can play like a pro with all classes then you have a prodigious eye-hand coordination and reflexes, you should consider becoming a surgeon, artist or an engineer, not just a gamer).

    Also, calling others noobs or whatever for not playing all classes like pros or having +15 gear on all their alts serves no purpose, let them play the way they want as long as theyre aware they're aware of the above points.
Sign In or Register to comment.