[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85

[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20

Are you on Highwatch, Lake of Tears, or Valley of Titans? Please read and give feedback!

1111214161761

Comments

  • KahzRBKahzRB ✭✭
    If merge all to pvp is considerable, then why not merge all to pve?
    I'm telling EME do not force us to make a choice here, join and deal with it or quit. Even with a transfer fee discount, it is not enough. This is a quick fix for your own good at the cost of your player feeling & investment. We are not your dedicated milk cow, we have a limit of tolerance.
  • null

    Grow up
  • I'm against. I played on PVE server to be free from the PK. I'm not interested in GvG. I like PVP only at battlegrounds.
    Hands off our PVE server.
  • SametbhSametbh ✭✭✭
    edited July 2016
    @Treeshark thanks again for addressing this. As a highwatch endgame PVE player running DSU, I really support this merger. Many players here have qualms with the new server being PVP.

    I'd suggest this:

    Make the new server PVE with no open-world PVP. With new GvG content, pvpers can pvp that way. Open-world PK wasn't the identity of LoT or VoT, so nothing is really lost there. Highwatch has a more active PvP scene than LoT and VoT. I'd work out to have the new server be PVE with no openworld PVP. PvPers can benefit from a more active GvG scene and more people pvping. PVE players can go without the worry of being PKed.
  • Mobius1Mobius1 ✭✭✭
    edited July 2016
    I'm surprised that only the PvE players seem to be complaining.

    If I was on a PvP server and had to merge with a bunch of PvE players, I'd be upset.

    I'm not a fan of high levels ganking lowbies, but I still love the open PvP throughout all levels. I'd be mega pissed to lose that!!
  • NikuroTegaNikuroTega ✭✭✭✭
    To all the HW PvE players, there is a toggle that exists already to avoid pvp. It's called switching channels and AFKing in SZ.

    You're all welcome.
  • NikuroTegaNikuroTega ✭✭✭✭
    tal10 wrote: »
    I'm against. I played on PVE server to be free from the PK. I'm not interested in GvG. I like PVP only at battlegrounds.
    Hands off our PVE server.

    You don't have to participate in GvG. If you get decked on, you may simply forfeit.

    Also, it's not "your" server.
  • PantsuPantsu ✭✭
    1 question/concern I have about this actually, I cba to scroll through every page and read every post just to see if it's already been asked, so sorry if this is a double question.

    Assuming it's only LoT and VoT that get merged, because it seems that most of HW refutes the idea, what would happen if the amount of characters you have on the 2 servers combined to equal more than the allowed character limit(16)?

    An example of what I mean: I have 14 level 65s on LoT, and let's say I have 3 Level 65s on VoT making 17 total characters. Would I have to delete one in order to make sure I'm still within the character limit?
  • WOOOO Server merge talk!!!!

    I love the idea of of the LT/VT serer merge. I also think the pvp at 65 is a good option and the best compromise for everyone. I can't speak for HW members b/c I am a pvp player. I see a lot of people talking about a "neutral" option. I am definitely not ok with that. I will surely be excited to be able to party and raid with my own server members. Right now I am on VT and that isn't even an option for me. The merge is surely something I will be looking forward to.
  • I cannot believe this will finally happen, as a VoT player i can tell you right away in the prime time (meaning NA time even though a lot of EU and other zone players are there) we have like 20 players stainding in HW or Velika, LFG has been empty for 4-5 months but take my words literally, COMPLETELY EMPTY 24/7, not a single post for anything, i have a character on every server just to watch what is happening, check and compare broker prices, lfg posts, number of people ranked in crusade, VoT has 5 players on SSHM list :D, last checked LoT had 28 and HW around 40 i think, VoT is the most desolate of all servers, and yes when IM takes over 1h30m of course you give up eventually....
    so, the merge might save us and we do need HW in this cause VOT doesn't have mucch to offer to LoT unfortunately and that wouldnt change the picture a lot, and I understand most of HW community might be upset because of outlaw pking everyone so here is the deal

    MAKE CHANNEL 1 ONLY PVE AND REST CHANNELS PVP, SO WHOEVER WANTS TO OPEN WORLD PVP CAN GO TO OTHER CHANNELS AND THOSE PLAYERS FROM HW WOULD BE HAPPY IN 1 CHANNEL THAT WOULD BE ONLY PVE....SO EVERYONE HAPPY, BIG COMMUNITY. A LOT OF LFG FOR ALL DUNGEONS/BATTLEGROUNDS...

    your idea of only level 65 pvp server is not bad but has 1 flaw, when you are 65 you will be killed non stop by those in pvp gear just waiting in bushes to jump you, and i know HW players wouldnt want that so make pvp channels and pve channels on every map and everyone wil be happy
  • i play in valley of titans for 3 years
    and that is a good idea, mergin servers are very welcome
    since EME opened highwatch i saw valley of titan getin so low population
    i agreed with server marging,but i hope you made it a pve server
    :+1:
  • My only question is about limits on characters. As of now, I have 16 characters on LoT, 9 on HW and 1 on VoT. I'd be okay if did a server merge as long as I get to keep all of my characters but frankly, I put a lot of time into all of those characters and I'm gonna be pissed if I have to delete them to meet the allotted server cap.
  • if you want to play in "pvp style" play at PVP servers. leave PvE servers, or those who want to play the way he is playing right now. do not fix what is not broken. I am against the changes - I am satisfied with what we have now. hands off HW server.
  • At the moment over world PvP is worse than it is good. If you remove it entirely then high level players can't kill Puffpiss and that's a problem, but as long as level 65s can kill level 65s, Puffpiss will die and the spirit of the PvP server remains.

    That's sad cuz "Puffpiss" can probably 1v1 90% of all 3 servers with equal gear and win. tbh I think I'm the only one who beats his warrior in all of vot and his reaper beats me unless I d-stance cheese him and even then he wins 50%ish of the time.
    Also you cant be considered experienced when you don't know how any of your classes work and cant even touch me x)
  • tal10 wrote: »
    if you want to play in "pvp style" play at PVP servers. leave PvE servers, or those who want to play the way he is playing right now. do not fix what is not broken. I am against the changes - I am satisfied with what we have now. hands off HW server.
    tal10 wrote: »
    if you want to play in "pvp style" play at PVP servers. leave PvE servers, or those who want to play the way he is playing right now. do not fix what is not broken. I am against the changes - I am satisfied with what we have now. hands off HW server.

    actually what i suggest wouldnt change a thing for you cause you would play pve (as i would and i only play pve even though on pvp server) the only difference between pvp and pve server is outlaw declaration nothing else and if you dont have outlaw in channel 1 for example then what has changed from pve server? nothing :D
This discussion has been closed.