[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85

[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20

BRING THE OLD GVG SYSTEM BACK! CU Sucks!

edited October 2016 in PvP Discussion
Whos in favor of the old GvG system opposed to the new GvG system? I much rather see a sky castle then a tiny crappy looking tower! Also I want to GvG whenever not only on the weekends! What about all the people that have to do things on the weekends like see and take care of their kids for example. We need more flexability to have fun with mass pvp. (Ps they should really fix the rendering time on the gray blobs)

Comments

  • Why not have both? :) Although CUV feels unpolished, it is to me very fun. Unfortunately, not as many as I would have hoped participated in TR and for those who do it generally comes down to who has the most online at the time. If it were limited to one raid per guild, weaker guild towers, better and more spread out rewards it would be significantly better.
  • Jewlee wrote: »
    Why not have both? :) Although CUV feels unpolished, it is to me very fun. Unfortunately, not as many as I would have hoped participated in TR and for those who do it generally comes down to who has the most online at the time. If it were limited to one raid per guild, weaker guild towers, better and more spread out rewards it would be significantly better.

    Yea I agree since they already put the work in both sounds great! (specifically because the castles and flexible GvG battles are way better though :awesome:
  • nitrogeniusnitrogenius ✭✭
    edited October 2016
    mayfl0werr wrote: »
    Why not have both?

    I agree as long as the old system comes back with ability to gvg whenever not just only on the weekends like it is now with CU fml...!!
  • mayfl0werr wrote: »
    i cant play tera anymore, since i work saturday night, CU is awful in that aspect. gvg where good

    exactly my problem too! GvG whenever possible is what everyone will want!
  • aeee98aeee98 ✭✭✭✭
    Bring back alliance and make it worth playing lol.

    Guild levels had something good in it tbh, but they destroyed it with an honestly lackluster event for an event where some players won't be able to make it (if I am not wrong it would be monday morning for asia/australia), Conflict was the same but at least there was more incentive to provide for the guild (instead of getting the stupid guild bank back lol).
  • all they have to do is read these posts and listen to the players
  • Lmao. Old GvG was more or less dead. At least in CU during non competitive times you can have a free for all with friends.

    CUs issue though is the exploitation.
  • Felhammer wrote: »
    Lmao. Old GvG was more or less dead. At least in CU during non competitive times you can have a free for all with friends.

    CUs issue though is the exploitation.

    i agree it was kinda dead but i found it vastly more enjoyable then CU is, at least old GvG system you could have some fun vs an = ish guild but now it's just biggest guild zerg ok dead cool.... (i know bigger guilds aren't all numbers they often have gear sometimes communication or whatever but to a smaller guild a good 2/3 or more the population what's the point of going to CU?)
  • Old gvg system is dead and gone forever replaced by the "new" gvg system when crusades hit. They'll never revert that change either because it'd interfere with their plans to eventually reintroduce crusades as """"new"""" content.

    new gvg system was garbage anyway and actually is dead even when there was a reason to do it because of crusades. Old gvg system was far superior even with the safezone camping they just needed to give us a reason to actually gvg and not just dec on 3 random guilds a day because you're bored.

    And no, CU is NOT an adequate replacement for either gvg system. its not necessarily bad but it's not as well thought out as alliance.


    aeee98 wrote: »
    Bring back alliance and make it worth playing lol.

    THISSSS

    remove AC or make it a like 60 sec active buff with a 30 min cd or something, and then make ibams drop whatever is the latest vm mat or hell change spawns to once every 12 hours and make them straight up drop imp/ambush boxes.

    Too bad it'll never happen tho.
  • ToxicDemiseToxicDemise ✭✭
    edited November 2016
    Why not have both? Civil unrest needs some adjustment. The most obvious thing they need to change is when guild towers are destroyed the entire guild should no longer be able to play in the match. If this is guild vs guild why are guilds allowed to remain in the match when their tower is destroyed? I've seen guilds team up and take advantage of this. For example: A guild that isn't targeted with only 20 or so kills wins. Meanwhile a guild with 250 kills is being targeted by all the remaining guilds with towers destroyed so they don't get a win. The stronger guild should win. Yet the guild who doesn't deserve the win gets the win and all the winning money.
  • The GVG system is returning, it's just a matter of time.
    On another note, I wouldn't know anything about changes to Civil Unrest.

    Source
  • Keep V:CU and bring back old GvG... That way i can get my weekly prize for being first and have some in open world ;-)
Sign In or Register to comment.