[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85

[TERA PC] The 64-bit update (v97) is now live. Check out all the changes delivered on August 11 here: https://bit.ly/tera64_patchnotes
[TERA PC & CONSOLE] Summerfest Part 2: The Beach Bash is on from August 11 until September 1! Participate in event activities to earn tokens redeemable for costumes, consumables, mounts, and more! Details: https://bit.ly/tera_sf20

Recent Server Stability Issues

1222325272837

Comments

  • Just out of curiosity does the lag DC spikes happen all the time for those who experience it or does it happen at specific hours?
  • DelusoDeluso ✭✭✭✭
    Yep, lag happen in specific hours but it is not what you called "lag spikes" since its "stable" lag for few hours.
    Let's say normally you play with 80ms ping, then when those lag storm happen, it will be like 500ms "stable" lag with "spikes" roses up to 2k ms ping.
  • To me it's happening all the time, doesn't matter what time it is.
  • FafhredFafhred ✭✭
    edited November 2016
    Just out of curiosity does the lag DC spikes happen all the time for those who experience it or does it happen at specific hours?

    It does not appear at specific hours for me, but after a variable amount of time in game.

    I found that for me, when what looks like lag spikes start to occur (similar to stuttering in the game behaviour ), I just need to close both client AND launcher; WAIT for the pop-up, then restart all.
    That gives me 100 % fix for 'lag spikes' issues until the problem re-occurs, which appears to depends how many times any of my characters arrived on any map.

    My conclusion is that this issue is probably caused by the launcher itself, and is definitely not directly related to Internet lag or routing (it could still be a secondary effect over time of lag affecting the launcher, since the launcher is not just a launcher in this game - It would not need to be kept open for the game to run).
    It would be nice if others could also check this; nothing lost if that does not solve their immediate issue, but a good hint for the developers if it does.
    Lag can occur (or not) independently to this, so it should not be merged as a single issue.
  • Fafhred wrote: »
    Just out of curiosity does the lag DC spikes happen all the time for those who experience it or does it happen at specific hours?

    It does not appear at specific hours for me, but after a variable amount of time in game.
    This is probably a different issue -- possibly a memory leak. It's been known to be caused by game controllers, but could be other causes.

    I also don't think it's connected to the launcher because your in-game connection does not go "through" the launcher at all. It only uses it to authenticate to the lobby server and things like the store in a few cases. Even if you were to close the launcher, you could continue to play the game indefinitely in most cases until you try to switch servers or access a web service.

  • What's up with this insane lag at TR in Harrowhold?
  • Has there been an official update yet on what the problem is or the solution on how they are going to fix it?
  • again lag issues come on enmmasse , plis change server hosting
  • Fafhred wrote: »
    Just out of curiosity does the lag DC spikes happen all the time for those who experience it or does it happen at specific hours?

    It does not appear at specific hours for me, but after a variable amount of time in game.
    This is probably a different issue -- possibly a memory leak. It's been known to be caused by game controllers, but could be other causes.

    I also don't think it's connected to the launcher because your in-game connection does not go "through" the launcher at all. It only uses it to authenticate to the lobby server and things like the store in a few cases. Even if you were to close the launcher, you could continue to play the game indefinitely in most cases until you try to switch servers or access a web service.

    It IS related to the launcher, because the issue does not get resolved if I do not close it and wait for the pop-up which follows it (found that by trials and errors, followed by triple-checking); and yes, that is it is most likely a memory leak issue.
  • Remove dreamstorm. Rewards r aht and makes server laggy.
  • Kira98Kira98 ✭✭✭
    WG7WWET5R3 wrote: »
    Remove dreamstorm. Rewards r aht and makes server laggy.

    +1
  • Harrowhold still lags after closing Dreamstorm.
  • TechGuyTechGuy ✭✭
    edited December 2016
    @Spacecats @Denommenator
    well, it is so hard to implement a "path" selector from the launcher? example: like path 1 ( routed thru zayo) pointing to 10.0.0.1 (example ip) , and path 2 (routed thru savvis ) poiting to 10.0.0.2 (example ip) , both gateways redirecting to the game servers in the same facility? so people can choose which routing path fits them better?, I mean its another hop in the traceroute but the latency introduced by that would be under 5ms if both gateways are "next" to the gameservers in the same facility
  • FafhredFafhred ✭✭
    edited December 2016
    TechGuy wrote: »
    @Spacecats @Denommenator
    well, it is so hard to implement a "path" selector from the launcher? example: like path 1 ( routed thru zayo) pointing to 10.0.0.1 (example ip) , and path 2 (routed thru savvis ) poiting to 10.0.0.2 (example ip) , both gateways redirecting to the game servers in the same facility? so people can choose which routing path fits them better?, I mean its another hop in the traceroute but the latency introduced by that would be under 5ms if both gateways are "next" to the gameservers in the same facility
    Yes; it is simply NOT possible, since the routing pathfinding is done starting from the the user's router, and depends the user's ISP AND connection point to start with.
    The way it is done is part of the underlying IP protocol, and companies have no control over how users will be routed to them, other than which will be the final hop to their servers.

    Doing what you suggest would require an entirely different type of software which does not exist to my knowledge (and may not be possible).
    That software would have to REPLACE the routing process, accept or ban specific hops, the quality of which vary could over time; I see several cans of worms opening just trying to create and implement such routing black-listing; including the simple fact that white-listed nodes would soon become overloaded themselves as a direct consequence.
This discussion has been closed.