[TERA PC & Console] En Masse is closing, but TERA lives on! We will continue to support TERA PC (NA) and TERA Console until service is transferred. Stay tuned for more information.
[TERA Console] The Grotto of Lost Souls update (v85) is now live! Read the patch notes here: https://bit.ly/TERACon_v85
[TERA PC] The Undying Update (v98) is arrives on Tuesday, 9/8. Check out the patch notes here: http://bit.ly/terapc_na_v98
counterpoint
About
- Username
- counterpoint
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,746
- Last Active
- Points
- 4,655
- TERA Server
- Ascension Valley
Comments
-
(Quote) That was definitely the idea, I think (and was how I saw it). The only downside seems to be that some HW players are very against any potential for OWPvP on principle, and just can't stand the thought of being on a PvP server, even if it's…
-
(Quote) That's the entire point of it being a PVP-65 server: PvP is only possible for level 65 players against other level 65 players. All players below level 65 are immune.
-
(Quote) Just to avoid misunderstanding, that is the one specific thing that would not be possible on the proposed server.
-
(Quote) Well, it's also worth stating that not everyone participating in the discussion even has characters that would be affected by the situation anyway, they are just upset about the principle of a PvE player being "forced" onto a PvP …
-
(Quote) Tell that to the massive angry thread from a few weeks back. The raw population numbers are okay, but end-game community was felt to be too small, and the general sense was that anyone skilled is leaving for MT and TR. Maybe that thread …
-
(Quote) You're making it only about this one issue -- that PvE players shouldn't be forced on a PvP server, even if it's PvP-65 -- because that principle is super-important to you, and I get it. But there's more at stake for at least part of the H…
-
(Quote) Yes, but according to a very massive thread that happened only a few weeks ago, they also don't want to be on a "dead" server, defined by the lack of a vibrant end-game community. So what are the choices? EME has already said tha…
-
(Quote) There's no evidence for that. The game doesn't need more than one PvP-65 server, and there's no reason to convert other PvE servers to PvP-65. This is a unique opportunity caused by a very specific population situation. If this goes thro…
-
(Quote) Because, to ensure the best long-term growth prospect for the new server, it's better for it to have a unique identity that will give it some opportunity to grow over the longer term. If it's just yet another PvE server (as HW is now), or …
-
(Quote) I'm sure there's a lot of things that could be done if programming time were dedicated to solving this kind of problem, but I don't think BHS is interested in spending time on this sort of thing. So technical solutions that involve changing…
-
(Quote) The only reason HW is involved in this whole thing at all is because a portion of the community said very clearly that HW has a problem. Of course, not everyone agreed that it had a problem (even EME said that overall population on HW is f…
-
(Quote) This is not a "trust" or "breaking promises" issue. The whole reason for this thread is to get feedback. If, after considering all the feedback, the decision is made to follow this course, it won't be because they're &…
-
(Quote) Well, I think the whole reason this thread exists -- to get feedback when it's clearly not set it stone yet -- suggests it isn't really about forcing anyone to do anything. It's just a proposal. It was presented to the Player Council memb…
-
In the end, there is no way to do it that's 100% fair to everyone, as was said. The proposal of a 100% name wipe isn't really more fair either; people who have had their names for years and used it constantly could lose it simply because they weren…
-
(Quote) Because a mass-exodus of skilled players to MT would defeat the whole benefit of any merger, at least over the short-term. A partial exodus of HW players to AV or some other server (not TR) would still hurt a lot, but there's a bigger chan…